Did Tyson put more on his shots v Berbick than he did v Holy?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by mark ant, Nov 13, 2019.



  1. Eddie Ezzard

    Eddie Ezzard Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,282
    4,665
    Jan 19, 2016
    You didn't get the teeniest sense I was joking when I said Tyson 'bit down' effectively v Holyfield, then? I'll try to be less subtle next time.
     
    Jobo1878 and mark ant like this.
  2. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,430
    May 4, 2017
    Maybe but Marvis couldn`t have carried on v Tyson anyway he was smashed.
     
  3. manilavanilla

    manilavanilla New Member Full Member

    94
    100
    Oct 30, 2019
    If Holyfield turns it into a firefight Tyson knocks him out, if Holyfield is cautious, and I would bet he will be, he should win a close decision.
     
  4. channy

    channy 4.7.33 banned Full Member

    8,119
    8,909
    Feb 2, 2015
    What next?

    Did Mike put his left boot on first before the Lewis fight!!!
     
    PhillyPhan69 likes this.
  5. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,430
    May 4, 2017
    It wouldn`t have mattered by that stage.
     
  6. Wass1985

    Wass1985 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,436
    2,825
    Feb 18, 2012
    The new drug Anavar worked wonders for Tyson's body in the 90's, certainly better than the Sus and Deca he was in the 80's.......
     
  7. RulesMakeItInteresting

    RulesMakeItInteresting Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,016
    10,233
    Mar 23, 2019
    Yeah I thought he looked like a Deca head back then. I could be wrong.

    If so, it was an unfair advantage.