I think Baileys_tunes is a window licking, hockey hat wearing, drip tray needing, social outcast.:good
Until he fights another top 50 opponent, which he hadnt before Witter, perhaps then we can decide. For the moment he is a bum who exposed Witter.
In boxing terms he was a "bum" prior to the witter fight. Witter was 10/1 on against him and Bradley had never fought a top 50 opponent. Did you think the question meant, "did Witter get beat by: 1. A tramp; a vagrant. 2. A lazy or shiftless person, especially one who seeks to live solely by the support of others. 3. An incompetent, insignificant, or obnoxious person: This content is protected 4. One who is devoted to a particular activity or milieu
Congratulations on finding an online dictionary. I like the way you claim to speak for the entire boxing fraternity when arrogantly proclaiming he was a bum in "boxing terms". I think many would beg to differ child.
Until he proves himself against other opponents, we he may well do, I liked his style; he is still unproven at this level. As far as things stand at the moment, witter lost the fight, Bradley didn't win it. Are you saying that Witter put on a great performance, is that the great Witter you keep harping on about?
Sorry chairman, I thought this was an open meeting. Strike my comments from the minutes. ****. And that.
Show me a quote where I have said Witter was great. It seems twisting the argument to suit your agenda is a common practice among Hatton fanboys. Excellent. Finally you understand.
I'd like to see more of Bradley personally before I announce his greatness. I'm glad you think he's quality though Dan B, as thats another top notch champion in the JWW division, and should Hatton take the belt(unify the division) I'm sure you will be one of the first people to Heap huge praise on him for beating such a worthy contender. Great to hear it.
I see you have familiarised yourself with the quote button as well as the emoticons. Well done, the next step will be actually addressing the points made in posts.