did witter get beat by a bum?

You never know, the whole forum might actually be lucky enough to see you make a post with a point in it first.

 

Ask the people that matter ie Gaz, Beatboxer, Scurla, (dare I say) TFFP they already have. Now go to bed sonny like a good boy.

 

To be honest, I come on here to discuss and read about boxing dan B; not play tic tac toe.

Good luck with carrying on your forum crusade, whatever that may be.

I'll let you go now and play your games with someone else; because they bore me rigid. :dead

 

i would not describe anyone who has the balls to get into the ring a bum!!!:thumbsup

 

Bum is defiantly the wrong terminology to use for anyone who has the courage to step in the ring; but Bradley going by the odds before the fight was a very weak challenger.

 

:thumbsup lol i am not a gambling man but did you have a bet, i must admit i didnt know much about bradley, i see the pics of him and he looked mega fit!!!

 

I do have the odd flutter here and there, but I tend to stay away from betting on boxing because of some of the ridiculous decisions you tend to see.

It honestly crossed my mind though, but I didn't no. He was a huge outsider and considering he was undefeated, in hindsight, it was a great bet.

Oh well..

He doesn't look a bad little boxer, just need to see more of him to make a real decision on how good he really is.

 

no,witters the bum

 

Me neither, agreed. FWIW I certainly don't think there was anything wrong with Bradley. Okay he was unproven before the fight, but being unproven does not necessarily mean he was no good (look at PBF prior to the Genaro Hernandez fight). Having watched the bout, I was pretty impressed with Bradley, nice boxing skills, good tactician, decent chin and more pop than you would think was the case from his record.

Oh, and a decent headbutt to the jaw as well:nut