Did Wladimir Klitschko actually fought the best opposition available?

You do have complexes otherwise you didn't even had posted in forums to get likes for your posts. This at first.

The some boxers who were undefeated before fight vs Wlad and now too are used in modern cool era?
Of course.

I think Chisora then did not had so high money generating potential for Wlad too.
While Vitaly had to sit on WBC ranking, Wlad had more belts from other orgs and therefore most likely had assumed that he needs more money for fight.

 

Classy? LOL don't mention class when Klitschko shamed himself vs those fights against Haye and Povetkin... If any rules of boxing were followed this twat would have been disqualified from both fights.

Essentially, Wlads "boxing" is clinching and pushing opponents to the floor when he has absolutely no method of boxing them following rules. Pansy

 

The problem is that he did not had attempted to fight for Undisputed vs Vitali cos this was his brother and this for both of them might had resulted in big shame and disrespect in society, both: business and general society cos they knew that they aren't poor and enough large part of Ukrainian society are christians and their belief systems are close to western european christians. To fight with brother for purse if you do have food on table is curse for life.

 

The fact that Wlad and Vitali have never faced each other does both and boxing credit. There are things money cant buy.

If they had fought it would have been either a farce or the two would have broken their bonds forever.

 

Wlad cleaned the division out. I didn't like how he performed vs Povetkin and it was a bit embarrassing for him to have to resort to that but vs Haye he boxed smart as a far superior athlete.

 

In fairness Lewis was notorious for holding an opponents head down and hitting them with an uppercut.

 

Far more than this. The religious thing in chistian societies in orthodox circles in EE are close to western euro chatolic, this example to give easier approach how to look at this variant if this had happened.

 

The best opponents Wlad faced in his career were his last two opponents. He lost to both.

 

You are liar and idiot who thinks that he does have brains to manipulate with me and maybe dreams to hurt me with his idiotic posts.

I use only facts: boxer's pro boxing record before fight and their age and weight in weight from reputable western media established during long years before this fight had happened.

While you attempt to use to fight in forum with me HS beginners level NLP tactics and are attempting to insult me and this does make me laugh with pleasure.
Your attempts might make me more fun than 2 hours in pub btw. Bear this and continue to cry there, you are fun and laugh for me.
Thank you, I hope you will continue attempt to play with me and waste your time to make me a lot of fun and pleasure for free.

I'm not angry, I'm thankful for fun I had from your posts and believe me, you make me a lot of fun for free.
Thank you for this.

 

Both old uncles beaters Fury and A.J?
Casual eddie card, like old Pov for Whyte and do not yell my small joke kid.
Eddie had flowchart to pick up uncles to push up his kids for decades.
Laughable fans, laughable pro boxing and laughable fun posts in forums.

 

Not even close Wilder cuck boy.
Beating a 40 year old man is not the same as beating someone in their prime.

 

Correct. But he was not prime anymore.

Wlad could have won against pre prime Joshua If the ref didnt stop the fight or If he went for it when he had him hurt.

It was a very close fight either way.

Fury is simply too good for either of them.

 

Totally agreed. I would add Fury did a real tactical masterpiece with Klitschko staying away for all the fight from Wlads right hand which if landed well It would have tore down him like Joshua.