I preferred Marquez s' effective counterpunching combinations to Pac's one punch at a time work rate. Not a robbery but I felt Marquez won the fight.
Not a robbery. Its a very close fight to score that could have gone either way. I have it 114-113 pacman
I voted yes and the fact that a judge who is a friend of Roach's mother was replaced the last week contributed to that. Such things should not be able to happen. The NYSAC can say all they want but they are the policymakers so f*ck those corrupt b**ches. I don't know everything in detail but I guess I've heard enough.
This was a close fight. No roberry involved. I agree with an article I read that said that the decision is more debatable rather then controversial. Both men did enough to win, Pacquiao just got the lucky bounce.
You're the only one out of 39 idiots who posted here voting for robberry:rofl Your post says it all about you:yep
The word robbery has become so overused on this board it's lost any real meaning. It gets thrown around after any fight that's close. What it really means is "the judges didn't score the fight exactly like me, so it must be robbery." And I'm saying this as someone who thought JMM won.