Didn't Miguel Cotto Already Turn Down a pacquiao Catchweight Rematch Last Year?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Slickstar, Aug 8, 2012.


  1. PBFred

    PBFred Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,057
    0
    Dec 12, 2009
    Pac's run is over puga. Time to give up the fight.
     
  2. Divi253

    Divi253 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,939
    4
    Apr 1, 2010
    Yes, I'm talking about both Clottey and Cotto.. Are you going to respond to the questions?

    Clottey took time off after the Baldomir DQ.. He won the comeback fight and fought again the same year to start back up his wins.. Only other prolonged absence has been after the Manny fight.. And he hasn't fought yet since that comeback fight.. which he won..
     
  3. Thatman

    Thatman No respond troll pactards banned

    5,744
    0
    Jun 10, 2012
    not sdsfinest...you didn't respond to anything I said either...
     
  4. Thatman

    Thatman No respond troll pactards banned

    5,744
    0
    Jun 10, 2012
    The guy is pretty stupid...he thinks that he can bother people over the internet. He doesn't understand that getting off topic gives him the loss automatically because he can't respond.
     
  5. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    you are saying that arum was basically pulling a gaga over cotto and clottey? how ******ed can that reasoning be. cotto explained to you in point blank that he feels good at the weight, after the fight and gave him props. stop twisting iit to suit your agenda.
     
  6. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    2
    Jul 19, 2004
    Well, you know Floyd was GOING TO vs. Winky. Whether he did or not, his intention was there. Some guys have the ability to have things hidden from public knowledge.

    You think Hopkins just decided to weigh in light vs. DLH when they fought?Or think about this, JMM was forbidden to talk about the weight limit during the promotions leading to the fight w/ Floyd. That way they could just bill is as a "WW Title fight" w/o advertising the size discprenacy to casuals who don't know better. Did you know that part? You have to accept there's a TON of stuff message boarders and fans will never know. That's why it's often silly when guys try to talk about how muich a fighter makes and such. We get ONLY the info they want us to have.
     
  7. Thatman

    Thatman No respond troll pactards banned

    5,744
    0
    Jun 10, 2012
    Marquez-Mayweather was not billed as a title fight. Wrong info reported there. Holler.
     
  8. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    2
    Jul 19, 2004
    Fine, WW fight. Doesn't change the clause JMM had.
     
  9. Thatman

    Thatman No respond troll pactards banned

    5,744
    0
    Jun 10, 2012
    source?

    You gave wrong info so you can't be trusted by "just your word." You report wrong information so your word is ****.
     
  10. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    2
    Jul 19, 2004
    **** off troll. I've seen you post enough to know you're a ****head alt. It was in an interview w/ JMM, so do your own research.
     
  11. Beenie

    Beenie Evolve already! Full Member

    19,105
    42
    Apr 12, 2008
    I haven't seen anything that would suggest that Pac himself is clamoring for a Cotto rematch at any weight.

    People are just dancing to the tune that Arum is whistling.
     
  12. Divi253

    Divi253 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,939
    4
    Apr 1, 2010
    How am I twisting **** to suit my agenda? I'm asking you if you find it funny Cotto accepted the fight at a catch-weight while under Top Rank (Pac asked for 142lbs and Cotto wouldn't go lower than 145), said it was no problem after the fight while under Top Rank, then immediately after he left Top Rank said he won't drain himself again?

    Furthermore, Clottey has pretty much completely disappeared after that interview.. While in the interview he says things like he had to lose that night, he won't speak on it again because what you say about the past will effect the future, and much more.. Everything I wrote is fact, nothing has been twisted. You've yet to answer the question.

    If you don't find it funny, why do you believe Cotto said he wouldn't drain himself again? You said to hype up a Floyd fight, but the fight wasn't signed then so that reasoning is thrown out the window.
     
  13. Divi253

    Divi253 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,939
    4
    Apr 1, 2010
    No I had not heard that.. What was the penalty Floyd was enforcing on Wright per pound he came in over the limit? :think Source as well please!

    Did ODLH have a per pound penalty vs Hopkins? If so, please share the source. I did know that about the JMM fight, but what does that have to do with a per pound penalty over weight? :huh

    So you believe the per pound penalty information is only released for Pac's fights, because somehow Arum can't hide that but Mayweather can? If not, why do you believe we only hear about it when it's in Pac's fights? Floyd and ODLH are/were just as big, both worked under Arum as well...
     
  14. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    it wasn't signed but we all know that they are cooking a cotto-floyd fight. even roger has been saying that arum would be surprised on who would be floyd's next opponent ( referring to cotto, who at the time was known to be still under arum). it's not funny, you are just trying to see things the way you want it without an evidence.

    cotto said that he felt good at the weight after the fight even if fighthype is trying to bait him to say otherwise. he gave props to pacman. 3 years later, he was referring to accepting a floyd fight at 154 instead of the 147 that pac was offering. not to the event 3 years earlier.
     
  15. Divi253

    Divi253 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,939
    4
    Apr 1, 2010
    Now we all know that they were cooking up a cotto-floyd fight before it was signed and he was still in negotiations with Pac as well? :lol: You guys throw out whatever you can make up to support your stance don't you? You think this was possible, Cotto signed to fight Floyd because Pac was trying to drain him again? Crazy right! How about we stick to facts, like I've been doing? So now we're listening to Roger again? :lol::lol: It gets better the more I keep reading! :nut

    I'm not trying to see anything, I'm asking you a few questions to get your input.. That you STILL refuse to answer!

    And my question to you HAS been and STILL is, why do you think Cotto switched his stance after he left Top Rank? Do you think they have nothing to do with each other? Do you think he just felt like bashing Manny with a lie stating he wouldn't drain himself again, even though he KNEW he felt good at 145 and wasn't drained? Are you going to answer any of my questions?