Difference between Ring belt and Lineal belt?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by VG_Addict, Sep 14, 2012.


  1. purephase

    purephase Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,740
    89
    Jan 14, 2011
    The Ring title previously couldn't get stripped unless a fighter left the weight class until the awful arbitrary changes made this year. Also, the reason the two weren't equivalent for the flyweight and light heavyweight titles in the recent past is because The Ring simply decided to ignore existing lineages when the ratings were reestablished (the most memorable being Jones/[FONT=Arial,Helvetica,Geneva,Swiss,SunSans-Regular]Michalczewski)[/FONT]. See the second half of this article for a good overview of The Ring/lineal divide: http://web.archive.org/web/20081205115749/http://www.maxboxing.com/Cliff/Rold040908.asp

    As noted above and earlier in the thread though, The Ring's recent changes should be seen as completely severing the connection between their belt and the lineal title. They may as well be another sanctioning body at this point.
     
  2. VG_Addict

    VG_Addict Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,727
    3,933
    Jun 13, 2012
    Another thing I get from this thread is that the Ring and lineal used to be the same, but not anymore because of recent changes.
     
  3. randy brown

    randy brown $$$ Full Member

    1,866
    0
    Oct 28, 2011
    who labels or crowns the lineal champ?
     
  4. purephase

    purephase Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,740
    89
    Jan 14, 2011
    Right, they were very close to the same and the two had converged on many of the things that initially made them different when The Ring's ratings restarted (save maybe Erdei and Pascal/Hopkins/Dawson), but they weren't quite the same.

    One difference persistent difference was rules for vacating a belt, something about which there's no universally agreed upon standard for lineal titles. This is why some still Floyd as the lineal champ at welterweight, dating back to his victory over Baldomir. Others still regard him as lineal due to his victory over Mosley, something else The Ring precluded by deciding that Margarito-Mosley should not be for that title.
     
  5. randy brown

    randy brown $$$ Full Member

    1,866
    0
    Oct 28, 2011
    if a lineal champ loses this title, is it possible that he retrieves it back?
     
  6. VG_Addict

    VG_Addict Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,727
    3,933
    Jun 13, 2012
    Then what makes someone the lineal champ, and how do we know someone is the lineal champ if there's no physical belt?
     
  7. VG_Addict

    VG_Addict Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,727
    3,933
    Jun 13, 2012
    What's wrong with the WBA, WBC, and IBF belts?
     
  8. CHEF

    CHEF Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    29,319
    133
    Aug 22, 2006
    please NO guys... not another belt.
     
  9. Jack

    Jack Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,560
    67
    Mar 11, 2006
    I think Wlad has been the champion since he beat Chagaev. As far as many people are concerned, myself included, Wlad has defended 'the' crowd 5 times. Before that, he was nothing but a beltholder.
     
  10. pong

    pong Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,732
    1
    May 11, 2011
    the ring belt is just as worthless as all the other belts now that they have changed the way the award it and brought in rules to strip fighters of it
     
  11. ripcity

    ripcity Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,449
    51
    Dec 5, 2006
    The Ring Belt is awared by The Ring Magizane
    The Lineal championship is the man who beat the man who beat the man...