Differences between Audley and Wlad.

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by Earl-hickey, Nov 4, 2010.


  1. Scotty321

    Scotty321 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,516
    0
    Dec 21, 2008
    Have you seen your own avatar mate?:lol:
     
  2. bratwurzt

    bratwurzt Whore Full Member

    3,816
    1
    Jul 19, 2004
    :lol: I have surprisingly. Now you mention it it does actually look a bit like a turd
     
  3. achillesthegreat

    achillesthegreat FORTUNE FAVOURS THE BRAVE Full Member

    37,070
    29
    Jul 21, 2004
    wlad has good footwork, audley doesnt. wlad has a heavy jab, audley doesn't. wlad can win a fight with just his jab, audley couldn't. wlad hits like a truck, audley doesn't. wlad has game plans, audley doesnt. wlad comes to win, audley doesn't. wlad does his talking in the ring, audley doesn't.

    there is almost nothing alike other than they are both big.
     
  4. Squire

    Squire Let's Go Champ Full Member

    9,120
    4
    Jun 22, 2009
    Explain how Wlad has dodgy footwork? He actually has very good footwork which seperates him from the other tall superheavyweights who aren't able to fight from range as effectively. Also Wlad doesn't just have a good jab, he has a ATG jab.

    Look at the long list of wins Wlad has on boxrec, then imagine how Audley would have done against the same opponents. That is the difference between the two
     
  5. boxingscience

    boxingscience Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,879
    312
    Feb 5, 2010
    wladimir is an excellent boxer, audley is not. theres no point in me explaining what wladimir does better as i haven't got that long to type such a long list. what i will add though is that even though wladimir is an excellent boxer, all that good footwork goes out of the window when he's caught with a good punch. how many times have we seen wladimir go down time and time again by just looking really clumsy. he's very good, but he doesn't have great survival skills in my opinion.