What a ridiculous blanket statement. Parker couldn't get away from Whyte? The man who has one of the worst balance and footing and mobility in the division? Nah... Parker WANTED to trade with Whyte. He could easily have just played it safe and outpointed him, why risk it? He needed to get back in the mix after losing to AJ. Whereas with AJ there wa a rematch clause no? So he didn't have to play it overly safe. You are spreading propaganda not me. Let me make it real simple for you: Parkers vs Whyte Parkers vs AJ Both Whyte and AJ had 36 minutes to land shots. They both DID land shots. Parkers felt Dillian hit him harder. **** triangle theory and all the nonsense and drivel you brought up. Don't over complicate history. That theory applies when there are three distinct match ups between three distinct fighters, NOT when two fighters have fought the same fighter.