Dillian Whyte has had over 40 days and counting to explain himself! Anyone truly innocent would have put this to bed a long time ago yet we know Dianabol doesn't accidently appear in one's system to result in an atypical blood test. Your boy's silence and schemes of hiding behind laywers is enough to tell us that he is a lying drug cheating fraud Imagine that, an athelete in their prime that touts themselves as being amongst the elite, needs the strongest anabolic drugs to beat the likes of Ian Lewison, Malcom Tann, Lucas Brown and Dave ****ing Allen.
You obviously didn’t listen to the interview. The question wasn’t about the B sample, it was in relation to clearing his name and this is the legal process he is going through with UKAD and their confidentiality agreements
30 days!!!! You can't even count!!! When Whyte is cleared, you will get roasted for parroting piece of information you know nothing about. By the way, adverse finding is different to atypical finding according to UKAD, might want to educate yourself sometime.
Really? Ohhh goodness... Wait, give me 5 minutes, I left my conspiracy hat at home. I'll go get it, then we can congregate in robes with the others.
Taking multiple scoops of a pre workout hours before a fight that contains a banned chemical isn't shady?
Thought there would be more news out about the Dillian Whyte drug test by now. With how long everything is taking it does not look good.
Whyte's ban began on October 13th and will end on 12 October 2014. The UKDA's decision is available via [url]http://www.ukad.org.uk/anti-doping-rule-violations/current-violations/[/url]. They ruled that: 'Jack3d is a manufactured pre-workout supplement. Its purpose is to enhance sport performance. The Respondent was taking it for that purpose and doing so right up until shortly before he fought. The connection between his taking of the product containing the Specified Substance and the competition was immediate. Notwithstanding his ‘open use’ of it and the fact he brought it to the attention of the doping control officer (in general terms on the form and expressly by showing him the tub — which UKAD accepted he did), the circumstances required that he exercised greater precautionary measures. He failed to satisfy the Tribunal that he had done so,' when making their decision.
They were both indeed banned for the same stimulant, though in Maccarinelli's case the product used was called Dexaprine, not Jack3d. Anyway, the difference between the two was that Maccarinelli used the MHA in training (which is allowed), but a small amount was still detectable in his urine after the fight. The amount was small enough for UKAD to accept that Maccarinelli only meant to use it during training and that the stimulant would have provided no benefit during the fight itself. Whyte, on the other hand, took several scoops of Jack3d on the day of the fight, which means he definitely benefited from a banned stimulant during the actual fight. The concentration of MHA in Whyte's sample was almost 60 times higher than the concentration in Enzo's sample (15 µg/ml, or 15000 ng/ml, vs 260 ng/ml). Two years was the standard tariff for a doping violation at the time, though the ban could be shortened if the athlete didn't take the MHA in-competition to improve performance. Whyte took the stimulant right before the fight to improve his performance, Enzo Macc didn't, so there's the difference.
