Dillian Whyte PED Discussion: Guilty? Not Guilty? Who Cares?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Kratos, Jul 24, 2019.


Do you think Whyte deliberately took a PED?

  1. Yes

    173 vote(s)
    67.8%
  2. No

    35 vote(s)
    13.7%
  3. Maybe

    29 vote(s)
    11.4%
  4. Who Cares?

    18 vote(s)
    7.1%
  1. George Crowcroft

    George Crowcroft Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    26,783
    43,916
    Mar 3, 2019
    How do you feel about being wrong?
     
  2. Puroresu_Fan

    Puroresu_Fan Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,618
    6,476
    Apr 6, 2016
    He did pass his Vada tests which were clear so are you saying he has Vada in his pocket?
     
  3. On The Money

    On The Money Dangerous Journeyman Full Member

    29,548
    14,131
    Apr 4, 2012
    Whyte will also be getting dropped the Wach Machine later.
     
  4. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist

    25,019
    15,831
    Apr 3, 2012
    I told you less than a week ago that the British Board is a profit driven joke. I’m not wrong.
     
  5. Reppin501

    Reppin501 The People's Champ Full Member

    21,908
    3,241
    Apr 26, 2010
    I don’t care that he’s juice junky, but I don’t want to hear his fans bitching about other drug cheats. He’s a drug cheat, this much is clear...
     
  6. Malph

    Malph Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,330
    10,799
    Mar 31, 2007
    The sport needs to be cleaned up. Either make the PED testing more systemic, thorough and with harsher penalties or just legalize the stuff and watch the records fall.

    We might see records like "ivan Unpronounceableski. Now 68 and 0 with 67 knockouts. Started his career at flyweight and now fighting at HW. Gained 129lbs of solid muscle over his career without an addition ounce of fat. Holds a belt in 12 weight classes simultaneously".

    Make it a positive. Fighters could be sponsored by companies like Pfizer who could use it as a way to market their products.

    In all seriousness, it should be cleaned up.before someone gets killed or maimed. Plus, its completely unfair to fighters trying to do things the natural way.
     
    gmurphy likes this.
  7. gmurphy

    gmurphy Land of the corrupt, home of the robbery! banned Full Member

    14,883
    10,943
    Oct 30, 2013
    Wilder dodged a dangerous mandatory for a year, fair play to the wilder bodyguard council
     
  8. ellerbe

    ellerbe Loyal Member Full Member

    38,755
    15,310
    Jul 25, 2014
    Holy ****... Whyte is such scumbag pos orc. Basically he's saying, I got away with cheating, if you criticized me before **** YOU I won't forget, I got away with it *****.
     
  9. GALVATRON

    GALVATRON Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    7,694
    4,242
    Oct 30, 2016
    Traces are usually a result of contamination or a insignificant amount but he would have no time prolonging some crazy doping scheme....lol


    He passed VADA .If he was doing anything illegal he picked a real bad time .I really don’t think he’s going to get banned a second time knowing the last one was a legal over the counter one in a pre workout formula and risk a career by taking small amounts of dianobol and costing him millions.
     
  10. GALVATRON

    GALVATRON Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    7,694
    4,242
    Oct 30, 2016
    That wouldn’t really matter ,the WBC will go by when he was reinstated and that’s another year from when the mando is due. In Wilders case 2 if he wants. Lol
     
  11. ellerbe

    ellerbe Loyal Member Full Member

    38,755
    15,310
    Jul 25, 2014
    Lol @ some of these posters on here, imagine being that stupid to think that Whyte is a threat to Wilder.
     
    AdamT likes this.
  12. GALVATRON

    GALVATRON Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    7,694
    4,242
    Oct 30, 2016
    Anyone with a punch is a threat to Wilder who looked bad as ever his last fight ,you would in reality have to be stupid not to understand a guy with a left hook and body attack Whyte brings is a threat period. :imwithstupid:
     
  13. theanatolian

    theanatolian Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,602
    5,901
    May 2, 2015
    I don’t have a problem with anyone thinking Whyte is a threat to Wilder, It’s an opinion after all.

    That being said, to say that WBC is trying to protect him from Whyte when they just ordered him to face a vastly superior HW in Fury(who’s the #1 HW in the world and rightly so, according to the Ring) is outright idiotic.
     
  14. GALVATRON

    GALVATRON Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    7,694
    4,242
    Oct 30, 2016
    Wilder is contractually obligated to face Fury ,the WBC has zero to do with that. They made Fury mando so he has less competition to deal with. Fury and Wilder agreed to a 3 fight deal.

    They only took the Fury fight thinking he wasn’t ready ,the whole objective is to steer Wilder away from one solid punchers who can box and aren’t over 40.

    Fury is the last guy left hanging to some credibility he can maybe get by ,even though he lost ...we all know he did.
     
    gmurphy likes this.
  15. theanatolian

    theanatolian Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,602
    5,901
    May 2, 2015
    Fury was made mandatory in early november. Though Wilder/Fury was being rumoured for february as early as september, It wasn’t official until late november. So WBC made the decision 3 weeks before the rematch was announced.

    Yes, they took the Fury fight for the first time thinking that he wasn’t ready. And yet, even though Fury proved that he was ready enough to beat Wilder, they still wanted the rematch. Solid puncher or not, Fury is a bigger threat to Wilder(or anyone else in the division) than Whyte, period.