Dillian Whyte PED Discussion: Guilty? Not Guilty? Who Cares?

Whyte ain’t lying though? He said ‘like’ a brother.

So what if he is biological brother or not? Show some damn respect there are many non biological brothers and sisters out there, orphan siblings too ...have you not seen the film Money Train? At least both these guys are black.

I have a brother from another mother as well

Whats the issue here????

 

He's not lying there because that video is from like 6 or 7 years ago, someone's obviously dug it up. But Dean's always been known as Dillian's real brother in every other video in the last few years since he became popular, mostly thanks to the baby ting episode.

 

Absolutely devastated if they are not real brothers.

 

That's weird as ****.

 

Well he did ice him. Different levels.

No. And neither is Chisora, a journeyman could never have beaten Spilka and Takam so explosively, or at all.

The actual definition is
In boxing, kickboxing and mixed martial arts, a journeyman is a fighter who has adequate skill but is not of the caliber of a contender or gatekeeper
Dillian Whyte is a top contender.

 

he has wars with everyone, he'll be a nearly man and nothing more.

End of!

 

Alright, Dean.

 

I get the feeling that the guy made the twitter account just now, just to dig up that video and attempt to hit Whyte when he is down, which makes me feel that maybe Whyte has beef with someone and they are trying to bring him down, and spike him etc.

 

Shwarz is ranked #2 after Fury by an org. The orgs are corrupt. He's not even a journey man.

Whyte is the same as Chisora, a British level gatekeeper. And that's with the roids.

 

Go see a shrink. You're delusional.

What happened to condemning Whyte if he had failed a test?

 

Why are all your posts defending Whyte or saying how good he is? Are you a troll account?

 

When did they stop calling them clubfighters?

 

You're losing it

 

This content is protected

So Dillian Whyte was juicing 5 wks before the fight lol?

Now I see why he didn't take the AJ fight because he was on his cycle, yet he was out there claiming lowball offers and TUEs

 

Some agencies consider dropping the necessity of B samples altogether simply because in the absolute majority of cases it's a mere formality underlining adverse results, and it just delays the inevitable, allowing legal teams and media ppl. to build cases against punishment. In the UK particularly, procedure says you are innocent until the B sample proves you guilty, hence Whyte failing a test for two metabolites of a banned substance, and still able to fight, surviving a KD and grab a win. Now imagine Miller actually fighting AJ in the UK: he could've permanently damaged him while green lit for a fight, awaiting three separate B samples, that's how idiotic the BBBoC is handling this.

The question everyone asks now is: what happens if and when the B sample comes back dirty as expected? Legally I mean.

Will the adverse finding even be reported to VADA, the WBC, Team Rivas and the public, or will some BS like "trace amounts" help all involved to sweep it under the rug? Considering Rivas suffered his first professional loss and some obvious bruises, can he sue for damages, gross incompetence, withholding critical health related information and so on? Can the result stay unchanged, because the BBBoC cleared Whyte to fight until further investigation? Can Whyte fight in the meantime like nothing happened?