Good to see Ringside back http://www.skysports.com/boxing/new...y-a-visit-to-dillian-whyte-at-his-brixton-gym
AJ or Dillilan ? im assuming AJ lol cos it wouldnt be "obvious PED user" it would be "proven PED user"
no I said it must be AJ that is being described cos it says "obvious PED abuser" if it was Whyte being described it would say "proven PED abuser". always needing things explained is our Sol
yeah obscenities are not required to make Solaris look a fool, just let him type and do all the work for you.
Are you telling me you read this sentence and it isn't saying AJ is a PED user to you? "AJ or Dillilan ? im assuming AJ lol cos it wouldnt be "obvious PED user" it would be "proven PED user" You are frighteningly stupid.
read the post im referring to ! He said obvious PED abuser ... I am saying that this reference cannot be about Whyte cos he aint obvious he is PROVEN. Its not a clear obvious dig at whyte there is some wit involved its understandable why your missing it !atschatsch next lesson ... what number follows the number 4 Sol ?!
Your reading comprehension is so utterly dreadful it's scary. If you learnt how to structure a sentence properly, your awful attempt at humour may have worked.