Dillian Whyte tests positive for banned substance

I think he means technical ability. Which if he does mean technical ability, he is wrong, wilder does have technical ability. So either way, he's incorrect.

 

Beautiful post. I can see Adyamn bashing away with rage and Rehashing the same nonsense he does all teh time

 

Yeah but amazingly he see Whyte as this technically sound fighter with an unbelievable defence!

 

"even though I have shown he does deals like that all the time."

You've never done this, can you do that now please? Thanks

 

No it is not

 

"As for rematching Ortiz, as before I've already given you explanation. Wilder felt it was right, to reward Ortiz with another big pay day because he identifies with Ortiz's struggle and his motive for forging a career as a boxer, which is to fight so he can be able to sufficiently take care of his chronically ill daughter

Something which should be commended, since such displays as humanity is a rarity much less appreciated"

You've got to be kidding me, you guys are joking me in applauding this justification, he might as well rematch Ortiz 7 times then to keep paying him. Guess if there aren't any rules to prevent it, Wilder can continue being a clown.

 

Right so Wilder is more technically sound than Whyte?

Because I've seen why throw combinations, I've seen Whyte strong with the Jab, the Left hOOK, the cross, and the body shots...

I haven't seen Wilder do the same across al punches??? Can you show me how Wilder is the same?

He doesn;t go to the body as much at all nor as strong.

 

Quote me something that I said when decsribing Whyte that is nonsense, because you talk nonsense.

 

Literally not what I said. Wasn't comparing the 2 at all

 

Clowns will believe whatever they want to believe.

I dont actually give two ****s.

I'll just support Whyte by myself and watch him continue to win, after he is cleared.

If anyone one of you has balls to man up and place bets, then go for it? Otherwise keep talking in an unconfident manner. Speaks volumes.

"Rivas gonna KO Whyte"

"Chisora gonna take Whytes souls"

"Wilder will decapitate Whyte"

"Parker will maul Whyte"

"Browne will send Whyte to the canvas"

Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah

 

Be clear in what you are saying then?

Because I literally did not say "amazingly he see Whyte as this technically sound fighter with an unbelievable defence" AT ALL.

I said Whyte is more technically sound than Wilder.. do you have a problem with that statement?

 

Refer back to the other thread, I have no time and patience to reference all the fight deals so in another thread you can pretend again that I haven't shown you anything.

What I will leave you with, is 3 more examples so you can stop playing dumb and finally rest your gums.

1'”I think if Usyk is serious about wanting to go up to heavyweight, you look at us, what we got,” Hearn said to IFL TV. ”He wants to fight Anthony Joshua. That’s the feeling we got from their camp. Not now, but when he’s in his prime at heavyweight. So if he thinks he can beat Tony Bellew, then he can fight Dillian Whyte after. He can fight Joshua if he beats him,” Hearn said.

2.

Tyson Fury ''Then he(Eddie Hearn) offered me a three-fight deal. One of them was to fight an American guy – Travis Kauffman. And then to fight Dillian Whyte and then fight Tony Bellew and then fight Joshua.

“We couldn’t agree terms [to fight Joshua]. There were no terms agreed to fight Joshua. Eddie can’t talk for AJ, he’s got to do his own thing. The facts of the matter is, I’m the lineal heavyweight champion of the world. I don’t have to fight three bums to fight anybody.''

3 Eddie Hearn says it’s already a done deal that Dave Allen will face former WBA heavyweight champion Alexander Povetkin next on August 31 if he beats David Price tonight at the O2 Arena in London, England.

Eddie Hearn '' Dave Allen keeps saying to me, ‘Give me [Alexander] Povetkin next.’ I spoke to Povetkin’s team. That fights on, as far as I’m concerned for the [Luke] Campbell [vs. Vasiliy Lomachenko] undercard [on August 31],” said Hearn.''

 

Right, so he planned a path, did he actually add those items as a "clause" in their contracts.... huh?? Nahh

I didn't think so.

We can end this clown case, acting like you a pencil pusher at Matchroom and you "know stuff"

 

Again you are twisting the post.

Let's just agree to never respond to each other again.

Deal?

 

Done deal.