Dillian Whyte tests positive for banned substance

The fight contract states that if both men are cleared by the BBBoC to fight, then they are both contractually obligated to fight.

Even if Rivas was told about the findings, he still could not pull out, and he would have a flimsy case for suing.

Thus Rivas would not get compensated, he would get sued by Matchroom, and Whyte.

Rivas can't pull out and appeal for mandatory. Whyte would have a strong ass case, by saying VADA who is affiliated with WBC clean boxing program, passed him on all accounts. Thus WBC are obligated to support Whyte, and ignore any calls by Rivas for being mandated for Wilder by default/NC.

Thus Rivas wouldn't have a chance in hell of being installed for mandatory for Wilder, because the WBC would get sued to kingdom come by Whyte. VADA might NOT impact BBBoC, but they certainly impact all WBC descisions, so lets not go there,.

 

Sorry mate, absolutely nonsense. Failing a drugs test is breach of contract.

 

"May have been unethical" lol

If it had been Rivas who failed and cracked on anyways you'd be literally hysterical screaming corruption. The fact that the silence has been so deafening from Brentwood and Brixton says an awful lot about how ensnared they are in this.

Every minute this drags on there is more and more damage being heaped on the Whyte and Hearn.

 

But was cleared to fight in.

 

Mate, forget about VADA. He failed a UKAD doping test. It doesn’t matter if he passed a thousand VADA tests, he failed a UKAD test.

 

Stop trolling lad.

 

If we had the contract we could confirm that, and this would be a closed case. But we don't.

Instead, Hearn said if they are both CLEARED by BBBoC to fight.

 

If the board refuse a licence to fight then yes.

They didn't, BOTH fighters were cleared to fight and EITHER then pulling out would have been in breach of their contract, pretty simple really.

 

As per UKAD rules, they have to notify the athlete affected and "any interested party", which would obviously include Hearn and really ought to include Rivas' team.

 

I love how the narrative is getting shilled hard by new low post accounts now that this was somehow all fine and dandy because it didn't break contract laws. Even though they have absolutely no idea what they're talking about.

Threadly reminder that these are invariably the same armchair lawyers that have been telling everyone for 2 months that Sir Edward, God Amongst Men has divine power to order where and when Ruiz does next, in complete contrast to what is actually happening.

 

You have no idea what you're talking about. You're like those clowns that used to post here 6 months ago lecturing everyone on how "real business worked".

 

You misunderstand, you said Rivas could pull out and then appeal to the WBC about being installed mandatory if he was informed ofr Whyte's failed test.

IN THAT EVENT, VADA takes over, UKAD have nothing to do with it, because WBC is not a UK organisation they do not answer to UKAD as much as they answer to VADA as part of the clean boxing program. Whyte passed VADA, and that's ALLL WBC care about according to all the information, documentation and articles WBC and VADA put out.

BACK to the UKAD sitation, this impacts BBBoC and is stipulated in the contract that the fighters should be CLEARED by these organisations for the fight to go ahead, this is what actually happened.

The panel of hearing NADP requested via UKAD is FAR more diverse than people are realising, it is not just UKAD, hence all those experts ASKED FOR VADA reports becuase it means something to an INDPENDENT panel that is INDEPENDENT of UKAD and the government, hence they make desicisions based on a variety of data, I have not seen the same process for WBC.... WBC take information from VADA PRIMARILY.

WBC STATE CLEARLY that you FAIL VADA, and you are DROPPED FROM RANKINGS, GOOD BYE. Thats what they say.

 

There's your first mistake - "Hearn said."

 

This is the biggest mess British boxing has seen in years

Well since Fury and his Boar antics i guess
Note the similarities


Somebody needs to come out and give a full statement
Times ticking and the more silence, the more it stinks

 

UKAD do not inform other parties, only Whyte himself, and BBBoC.