@CST80 @IntentionalButt Could you ban this shill account, please. Clearly, matchroom on damage control and you shouldn't allow that here.
I do wonder if UKAD and BBBOC would have released the information. Though the release of personal information by a rgird party leaves UKAD and the BBBOC open to a GDPR charge. All testing samples are anonymously labelled so some in UKAD, BBBOC or Matchroom leaked the info. cant help feeling that Whyte might have a strong argument to say he can't get a fair hearing under the circumstances. Just have to see how this plays out.
I’m glad you agree that so far everything has been followed correctly. I do wonder what the reaction would’ve been on here though had the fight between 2 cleared fighters been pulled at the last minute. I suspect those with an anti MR / DW agenda would’ve been up in arms about that too.
You really think Matchroom give a flying f**k about what a few clueless freaks on an Internet forum think ? Damage control on east side boxing , i’ve heard it all now ! At least there are a few more sensible posters on here to balance things out a bit.
Absolute horse****. Had it came out that one fighter had pissed hot for a steriod even if he had a hearing then im sure no one would complain. If his B sample passes then the fight can rearranged. If his B sample fails then it was clearly the correct thing to do. Should Whytes B sample fail what will your excuse be then?
it's not like they will ignore another's bodies test as has been proven plus there's members on both the wbc and bbbc same people. You fail a test you're screwed, any test