Dillian Whyte tests positive for banned substance

A month before? What’s happened there?

 

Haha

Can't help the way I feel.

 

Someone please summarise that Hearn interview in bullet points please. I’m not listening to that ***** in a video absolutely no chance.

 

about 12 minutes in Hearns is saying the people giving out about the Whyte situation have "agendas"

 

Now he has said that the WBC never wanted Whyte as mandatory and them suspending him is an "agenda"

 

This content is protected

 

Classic politician. Trying to portray Whyte as the victim here, utterly pathetic.

 

Wow, Dillian Whytes "defence" seems clear now

Hearns says that Dillian provided all the VADA tests he had done during camp and they were clear. If UKAD passed him based on that its insane! Its like if someone is breathalysed on the side of the road and is over the alcohol limit, but they tell the police they were breathalysed 10 times that month and those ones were clear so he is let go

 

I think Foreman and Joshua would be a better and more accurate comparison.

 

An AAF is just a test result showing the presence of a banned substance, or levels above a defined threshold.

An AAF may be acceptable due to a TUE, or if the measurement can be explained by reference to other test results over a longer period.

Chris Froome's legal team were able to argue that his AAF could have been the result of a permitted dose of salbutamol, based on the expected range of variation over 21 tests across 3 weeks.

AAFs don't always lead to anti-doping violations. It is likely that many AAFs go unreported and are resolved offline before they come to light (the exact process depends on the authorities involved). Froome's AAF may never have been made public if it hadn't been leaked to the press.

 

About 15 mins in. Interestingly - he's saying lots of the same things that @Aydamn has been repeating ad nauseum.

• People with agendas
• People don't want Whyte as Wilder's mandatory
• He was cleared to fight
• Whyte enrolled in VADA 365

edit - 20 mins in and he's starting to shift blame. Saying he is just the promoter, "Dillian is Dillian", his responsibility is to make the show happen and represent both fighters taking part.

 

So Eddie has went from knowing absolutely nothing because it happened 20 seconds before the fight started.

Too well it happen 4 weeks ago.

Jesus christ.

 

Another bizarre claim by Hearn was that Whyte had the failed test a month before the fight, but Whyte himself only found out 3 days before the fight. Before that it was Whytes "Team" that was dealing with it. What on earth does this mean ? If true how could Whytes team know Whyte was innocent for weeks before they even told him about it?

 

This content is protected

This is baffling from Hearns, no logic, WBC are protecting their fighters.

 

The most bizarre thing is Hearn genuinely trying to argue that people are fearful of Whyte being mandatory and that’s why he’s been suspended.

Are we to forget him being rocked to the core by Helenius, punched to the floor by Rivas, held by the ropes against Chisora and Parker barely able to stand, and my personal favourite him being Patrick Trueman’d at the hands of Joshua?

This is not prime Mike Tyson or Golovkin we are talking about here lmfao. Agenda...