Dillian Whyte tests positive for banned substance

It's all about the dates of the test, if they are quite a bit apart then i dont see why one needs to overrule the other.

Even if they are close is it scientifically possible to show differences for whatever reason? I have no idea.

 

As time goes by, will the B test show anything at all??

Why can't the results of the B test be shown straight after the first??

If for instance somebody is caught drink driving, they take a breath test and if they fail it they are arrested for being over the limit, within the hour they are required to provide a second specimen of breath, and the results are immediate so what is the problem with this case with WD.

 

Test B in 99.9% of cases returns the same as A, it's almost pointless testing it.

 

Loved boxing since I was a young lad - but right now, boxing leaves a bad taste. If it’s not boxers on the juice - & from the comments on this forum, many top fighters at least have a history, it’s the Hearn bull-crap show. A constant supply of egotistical drivel - in a desperate attempt to build up his PPV cash cows, yet, who in the main, are hyped up two or three levels above their capabilities. Fans are being conned right now.

 

Seems like a lot of people on here are suddenly back tracking.

 

We need to get this over and done with now. It is boring.

If it is only UKAD then it is as good as over, just threaten them with legal action and DCMS will fold

 

We need @Jurgen to come back and give us his take

 

Probably he was using some flushing agent/method to clear the stuff out or mask his use - and it failed him.

 

This content is protected

Hearn's been pushing a hardline these last 24 hours or so.

 

We don't even know when VADA tested him, do we ?

I don't trust VADA or any anti-doping agency.
The fact that Whyte pays for VADA "out of his own pocket" is being parrotted by Hearn and other defenders as some sort of evidence that Whyte must be "clean" .... LOL
Call me a cynic, but I would have thought an athlete personally (and 'voluntarily') paying for the testing would be deemed reason to put into doubt the credibility of the tests.

Anyway, all of this is irrelevant IF he failed a test, any test, for a PED, especially something like dianobol.

If this was just some unheralded undercard fighter, this would be done and dusted and he'd be doing a 4 year ban probably. But him being a top world ranked heavyweight on PPV main events, all this soap opera and confusion is taking place ...... and, odds are, he'll wriggle out of it.

 

If the tests were close then it is not only scientifically possible, it is fact, because it actually happened.
If they were not close then .... the same thing, it actually happened.
That's what we shouldn't lose sight of. It happened. He failed a test. No one has denied that.

The only thing that hasn't been confirmed is the substance in question.
If it was indeed metabolites of dianabol, then there's no reasonable explanation, unless they can prove sabotage or mishandling of the sample or something really unusual and really unlikely like that.

 

On second viewing, I'm not so sure.
He's had a long while to prepare himself for these questions so who can say.
Tibbs isn't a key player in this thing though, he's not even involved in Whyte's strength and conditioning stuff. Whether he's being entirely honest here is a non-issue.
Like he said, he has his job to do and that's that.

 

Probably been mentioned before in this thread, but what a tool Spencer Fearon is

 

Whyte was stitched up by his old friend Mr Kipling - you never know what you get these days in a French Fancy.

Whyte is now the official World Heavyweight Lineal PED Pudding.

 

Jurrrrrggggggeeennnnnn!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Welcome back lad!