Dillian Whyte vs Lineal champions

He loses to nearly all of them.

Different levels.

 

He was losing to a shot to bits Chisora in his last fight after 11 rounds

 

He might have beaten these guys, or they might have dominated him.

It is very hard to say!

 

He may have beaten Leon Spinks, but other than him. No , his sheer size does give him a physical advantage over most on this list, but his club fighter disguised as world class in today's boxing would be his undoing against true World Class competition from past generations of fighters.

 

I think that he is the fourth best heavyweight in the world at this time.

I also think that he is fairly beatable, and it won't necessarily take a champion to do it.

I am also in no hurry to match him against fighters like this yet.

What is the hurry?

 

You think he was nearly as good, let alone close to better, than this version?

This content is protected

 

To take this, lets say, interesting post seriously

Losses via late KO to Jeffries
Losses via KO to Fitz, Whyte is a live dog
What rules is the Sullivan fight under? When he was boxing, boxing didnt even resemble today's sport
Might UD Willard over 12. Over 20, he gasses bad and Willard knocks him out
Losses via mid round KO to Patterson
KO's Leon Spinks mid/late rounds
Losses via UD to Michael
Losses via late KO to Douglas
Losses to Moorer via UD, Whyte is a live underdog
Losses via KO to Foreman, any rounds
Losses via KO to Briggs, VERY live underdog tho
Might actually see him KO Rahman late rounds, Rahman is very live tho

Dempsey, Marciano and Baer would kill him within 5. Walcott and Charles make Whyte look like a fool and stop him

 

A version old too soon, wise too late, I suspect!

 

I just think Whyte made him look good. He is very flawed. Great counter left hook though.

 

Of course Chisorah is a guy who never got to the top, but routinely made people who did look bad.

 

You could say the same thing for Earnie Shavers, or Curtis Sheppard.

It's very, very unlikely.