Just a reminder, punching power is the last thing to leave a boxer. Matter of fact, as Roy Jones says as a fighter get older he gets better and stronger at punching. Whyte fought a strong Povetkin by that logic. This content is protected
Lets be honest whyte would be considered as a slugger in that era. The big difference is these guys and the guys before that learned how to become fighters/boxers by thousands of rounds of sparring. Nowadays its padwork and cross training. Its for the best....but it does show up in a massive skill disparity between the eras. I reckon even tommy morrison would have battered whyte badly. He was a proper handful if you didnt have the skill/size to deal with him.
2 - 8 Maybe 3 - 7. I think he could maybe take old Forman and old Holmes. (He would get brutalized by both these guys in their primes) Moorer would be close to a 50-50. There is a much better chance he would go 0-10, than that he would win 4 or more.
Most people thought he would lose to Parker AJ said he would only last one round against him Chisora said "Dillian, you aint got any punch that can worry me mate" Always underestimated. Most people here DKSAB.
Murdered by Holmes and Foreman?! Whyte hits far harder than a 90`s Holmes and Foreman struggled with Stewart.
You know for a guy as hated as Dillian Whyte on here, we talk about him A LOT. Some of this thread have like hundreds of thousands of views and messages. Unreal. Probably one of the most talked about guys on this website.