Dirrell did not hurt Froch. Why did Dirrell run, hold, fall down on canvas and complain? Looks like that's what Ward will do...........his judges, referee, commentators, venue. Will there be a horse shoe in Ward's gloves also? I wrote about the Ward fight a long time ago, then now this: Kessler Promoter Wilfried Sauerland announced that his team was objecting to the referee and judges, stating that they were all based in California and that neutral judges are required by the terms of the Super Six tournament. Sauerland said if the WBA does not assign any neutral judges for Saturday, Kessler will not put his WBA super middleweight title on the line and that the fight would be a non-title bout. More details to come
Froch clearly backed across the right and into the ropes after a scorching right hand because he has a large personal space bubble and Dirrell was in it. It had nothing to do with him getting caught flush and stunned.
Yeah, and I saw Dirrell runnning all night long. It was too late for Dirrell who could not hurt my grandmother. Froch was not hurt. It was Dirrell who was running, holding on for dear life, falling down on canvas, complaining. He wanted the referee to protect him.
Dirrell certainly hurt Froch. Not a close call. What again does this have do with Ward? Is it they are both black americans?
I suggest you watch the fight again. One time Froch threw him down and I don't blame him Dirrell was holding on for dear life.
He threw him down the second time Dirrell clinched. THE SECOND TIME. And it was halfway through the fight already. Perhaps you should watch the fight again?
Dirrell should have fought, but he ran! How many times did he fall down on canvas? It was on purpose. Froch should have thrown him out of the ring.
Once? Maybe a second time when I looked away? And I'll tell you what was on purpose...the shots to the back of the head, you know, the ones thrown by FROCH? The ones landed on the back of the head of DIRRELL? Dirrell DOMINATED Froch! If you think Froch should have thrown him out of the ring, why are you posting here and not on some WWE site somewhere?
Froch threw him on the second clinch of the fight. Dirrell had not fallen down at that point. Please explain how Froch threw Dirrell down to prevent him from falling or holding when Dirrell had done neither at that point?
You mean clinching and boxing? It's called....well...clinching and boxing? You didn't answer my question, btw.