Dirrell back in the gym

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by nip102, Nov 16, 2010.


  1. WesT

    WesT Boxing Addict banned

    5,772
    0
    May 13, 2009
    I'll still be surprised if Dirrell goes for Bute right away. :think Maybe Showtimes forces him threatening him with lawsuits
     
  2. WesT

    WesT Boxing Addict banned

    5,772
    0
    May 13, 2009
    Boom_Boom by your logic Froch shouldn't fight Abraham for his actions against Dirrell. He has committed a fault. Right ? So Froch is a **** to because he fights AA ? That's you logic.
     
  3. Boom_Boom

    Boom_Boom R.I.P Boxing 6/9/12 Full Member

    38,291
    23
    Sep 21, 2006

    :-:)-:)-(


    Pathetic, you are more worried about the glory of your fighter than the integrity of the sport. I guess thats not surprising since I dont see you post about any other fighters on the board.

    If it happens then Bute is a disgrace. EOM
     
  4. Boom_Boom

    Boom_Boom R.I.P Boxing 6/9/12 Full Member

    38,291
    23
    Sep 21, 2006
    Horrible comparison.

    :patsch:patsch:patsch

    The sad part is Bute hasnt even made the fight yet but you are already defending him if he were to.

    :-:)-(
     
  5. WesT

    WesT Boxing Addict banned

    5,772
    0
    May 13, 2009
    The sport commissions or Showtime didn't suspended Dirrell . Bute is not there to clean or to put order in the sport , he is there to entertain make money and build a legacy. STFU!! :patsch
     
  6. WesT

    WesT Boxing Addict banned

    5,772
    0
    May 13, 2009
    The sad part is you blaming him for a fight he didn't even made and being rly stupid about it
     
  7. Boom_Boom

    Boom_Boom R.I.P Boxing 6/9/12 Full Member

    38,291
    23
    Sep 21, 2006
    If it happens before the end of the super 6 then Bute is a disgrace.

    :|:|:|

    Truth hurts
     
  8. Boom_Boom

    Boom_Boom R.I.P Boxing 6/9/12 Full Member

    38,291
    23
    Sep 21, 2006
    No, lrn2comprehend

    I said if it happens before the end of the super 6 then hes a disgrace. You are supporting the idea before I even came up in here with it and you blindly defending it because you are only a fan of fighter and not of the sport.
     
  9. WesT

    WesT Boxing Addict banned

    5,772
    0
    May 13, 2009
    That's is what you are saying dude. That Bute is a disgrace because he risks losing against a cheater and destroy Bute v Winner of S6 but you leave out the fact that Showtime has him under contract so Shotime will be the match-maker , that he wants to prove he is the best at 168 and that he should'n be responsible for what Dirrell has done and how Showtime has dealed with "the injury".
     
  10. WesT

    WesT Boxing Addict banned

    5,772
    0
    May 13, 2009
    You are beyond reasoning. Your logic is demented. :nut
     
  11. pathmanc1986

    pathmanc1986 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,853
    5
    Oct 4, 2008

    are you not a massive fan of pacquiao?

    does the same principle not apply?

    he fought a guy who got caught committing the ULTIMATE boxing sin by loading his gloves and then couldnt get a license in all but one US state????


    surely then pacquiao has ALREADY done more damage than Bute could do in a as of now theoretical fight with Direll?
     
  12. Boom_Boom

    Boom_Boom R.I.P Boxing 6/9/12 Full Member

    38,291
    23
    Sep 21, 2006
    Oh man

    Please tell me you are atleast above 16 before I continue arguing about this with you.

    Your comparison is downright awful, you are comparing someone who committed an illegal act in the ring and was punished accordingly for it with someone who cheated their way out of a contract and to only get rewarded with a big fight for it. :patsch
     
  13. WesT

    WesT Boxing Addict banned

    5,772
    0
    May 13, 2009
    This content is protected
     
  14. Boom_Boom

    Boom_Boom R.I.P Boxing 6/9/12 Full Member

    38,291
    23
    Sep 21, 2006
    Ive always been against the Margo fight. Whats your point?
     
  15. WesT

    WesT Boxing Addict banned

    5,772
    0
    May 13, 2009
    Your right about one thing Dirrell didn't payed for his fault against the tournament and AA did payed for his fault.
    But why is this Bute's fault ?