You must be the dumbest mother ****er on here. Don't accuse me of making **** up when the evidence is there for all to see. "by the end I was disgusted with the decision.. It was clear to me who took it.. props to the Mexican judge who scored it right.. **** was a This content is protected .. " http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showthread.php?t=176989&highlight=robbed+robbery
'Dirrell (Ruiz-Bolt) came out of the fight smelling like a rose despite the loss' :rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl He stunk the ****ing joint out!!!!
That was borderline immediately after the fight.. I re-watched it again the next day and hence the rest of my posts saying Dirrell should of and could of done more.. although he still did win it in my eyes.. But if you want to talk about robbery's.. yes it was.. the Italian judge 'ROBBED' him of the 11th round for a start.. :deal At the end of the day, I'm not going to sit and argue with the biggest Froch nuthugger on the forum as it resolves nothing and the result is final.. You need to let the fight go.. Move on.. Get a girlfriend..
1 point, 1 round and you CRIED robbery. Shows you know **** all about boxing if you think 1 point in a close fight constitutes robbery. Face it mate, you were found out like a sucker and all you can do is make personal insults and excuses. Try being a ****ing man about it.
Abraham - Dirrell has potential for that too. Abraham likes to fight for 20 seconds a round. Dirrell doesn't like to fight at all. Bodes well.
Won't last as long though. Dirrell will get hit and won't be able to take the punches. We basically agree that any fight featuring Dirrell is likely to be a stinker though.
how am I making personal insults?.. Its pretty factual to me that Froch is your hero and you don't like bad words said about him.. get over it.. he was garbage on the night and if Dirrell had a different tactic the outcome would of been alot different.. It was a bad decision, not a robbery.. However at first glance you can't blame me for calling it one.. I judge fights on punches landing and the ability to not get hit.. not whether someone is running while throwing them.. so on that fact yes, it could easily have been a robbery.. I gave Froch the benefit of the doubt for being the aggressor, thus turning it merely into a bad decision.. Either way.. even if I cry robbery, its hardly unrealistic in my eyes.. or many other peoples for that matter.. get back to persuading yourself that Froch is the best around.. I'm entitled to an opinion, just because it goes against your hero shouldn't mean you have to throw your toys out the pram like your Froch's wifey..
I thought you weren't going to sit and argue with the biggest Froch Nuthugger on here? Perhaps you're now pacing the room in an adolecent rage? Seems to me you don't know your own mind at all. Scooby doo isn't half as confused as you pal :deal
Sorry, but he lost me when he said Dirrell looked awesome and then accused the British fans of bias. Even though I had him Dirrell a slim decision (a point with the deduction), I can't take anybody who'd call that performance "awesome" seriously.