Dirrell, Froch, and The Great Train Robbery

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Loudon, Apr 17, 2015.


  1. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    40,836
    10,233
    Mar 7, 2012
    :deal

    I hope he's interested enough and has the time to see the whole fight again.

    It was cringeworthy.

    What on earth were the judges watching?

    You'd got Carl's wife shouting "he's fighting like a fa*got!"

    Ha!

    Then his brother saying "he always fights like that"

    I f*cking hate casual know nothing's.

    They make me sick.

    It's not about two guys stood on the spot, whacking the sh*t out of each other.

    It's a game of chess.

    Balance, timing, feinting, setting traps, hitting and not getting hit back.

    It's an art and a science, the sweet science.

    These clowns shouldn't be allowed within ten miles of the arena.
     
  2. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    40,836
    10,233
    Mar 7, 2012
    No robbery?

    :rofl
     
  3. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    40,836
    10,233
    Mar 7, 2012
    It literally wasn't even close.

    If you scored it 9-3, you'd be being generous to Carl.
     
  4. conraddobler

    conraddobler Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    6,853
    148
    Mar 7, 2010
    Absolutely, let these philistine casuals be consigned to watching Omar Figueroa reruns for eternity in hell.
     
  5. Super Hans

    Super Hans The Super One™ banned

    48,579
    88
    Apr 18, 2013

    I've already watched it twice and scored it for Froch both times. And thanks to Dirrell holding onto Froch like a treasure chest in a hurricane and running, nay, sprinting, away from Froch it would be 45 mins of my life I'd never get back- that to me, is not classed as effective ring generalship.

    And no, not from the Nottingham times because one was a Yank :hi:

    You on the other hand only see it as a robbery because you don't like Froch.
     
  6. CST80

    CST80 De Omnibus Dubitandum Staff Member

    245,445
    241,066
    Nov 23, 2013
    :dealWhat you said.
     
  7. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    40,836
    10,233
    Mar 7, 2012
    :lol:

    :good
     
  8. Super Hans

    Super Hans The Super One™ banned

    48,579
    88
    Apr 18, 2013

    Put your bias aside and you will see no robbery either.

    While I'll put mine aside and say it could be scored for Dirrell, if you like stinking the joint out and trying to pinch every round, I did see it for Froch.

    Definition of a close fight that could go either way.

    Would you also say the Lara- Canelo fight last year was a robbery because that was very similar and I also scored that for Canelo.
     
  9. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    40,836
    10,233
    Mar 7, 2012
    What a joke.

    Get yourself to the opticians ASAP.

    Froch landed about 8-9 clean shots the whole fight.

    He literally didn't win any of the first 7 rounds. He was missing wildly and getting countered.

    Seriously, it was embarrassing.
     
  10. conraddobler

    conraddobler Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    6,853
    148
    Mar 7, 2010
    Was he sprinting away in 2:30, here. Have the courage to watch it, "Super Hans". Be brave. Steel yourself. Get up the nerve to watch Froch get all wobbly and disoriented as Dirrell pounds away at him.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GUm8AHqiPKU
     
  11. Ukansodoff

    Ukansodoff Deontay plz stop ducking Joshua. Thank you. Full Member

    10,980
    6,712
    Aug 7, 2010
    I watched that fight prob a little biased in Carls favour, i was prob listening along with the biased british commentators and i still scored the fight in Dirrells favour.

    He didnt do himself any favours in the later rounds at all considering he was fighting in another mans home town but unless Froch could knock him down a couple of times Dirrell had already got plenty of rounds in the bag to win it.

    I think i had it 7 rounds to 5 in Dirrells favour and felt i was very generous with 1 of Froch,s rounds. Could of been 8 rounds to 4.
     
  12. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    40,836
    10,233
    Mar 7, 2012
    There is no bias.

    We must have watched different fights.

    It's easy to say you don't want to watch it again. But it was a long time ago, and you may have remembered it differently.

    Carl went foward and got countered.

    He landed hardly ANYTHING.

    Andre's reflexes embarrassed him many times.

    Seriously, go and watch it.

    It's only 36 mins of your life.

    There's no point in taking this any further until you do.
     
  13. Super Hans

    Super Hans The Super One™ banned

    48,579
    88
    Apr 18, 2013

    OH MY GOD! A 3 minute video that is clearly bias as hell put together by Andre Direll's inbred sister has change my mind. What was I thinking scoring it for Froch when I watched the fight in full twice :patsch
     
  14. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    40,836
    10,233
    Mar 7, 2012
    I felt similar to yourself, until I watched it again an hour ago.

    Check it out if you have the time.
     
  15. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    40,836
    10,233
    Mar 7, 2012
    I'm sure you can spare 36 mins Hans to discuss what you love.

    Click on the link.