Dirrell stinks the joint out

That's probably part of the problem. There were easily five rounds in that fight where neither fighter did anything notable to lay claim to winning the round. By insisting that judges must pick one fighter or the other to award the round to increases the likelihood of widely differing scorecards.

You also get situations where you can have one round very scrappy with nothing happening that the judges choose to give to fighter a because he landed a couple of jabs or was coming forward more, but neither really did anything. In the next round fighter b controls the round and lands a number of nice shots. That is scored level over the two rounds. It doesn't make sense.

IMO, 10-10 should be the default score for a round until one of the fighters shows that they deserve to win it.

 

It was a poor performance but you have to take into account it was a massive stage for an inexperienced fighter. I think the tournement has come a little early for him and there is a good chance he will lose all three fight. But I think the experience he has gained will hold him in good stead for the future. He has amazing speed and reflexes he just needs to learn when to move and when to trade. That will come in time. I still think he has the tools to be a future p4p contender. This all depends on his suspect chin.