Dirrell was robbed in UK - Kotelnik robbed in USA

So do you want me to walk you through the fight or not? Seriously I could help you understand the sport better you know. If you dont understand boxing I'd be happy to help.:yep

Six pack


Oh and the very fact that James Toney could fight 4 weight classes above his natural weight, have a belly and still school the **** out of guys like the bum in your avatar, says alot about his abilities. :bbb

 

Froch won 4 out of the first 9 at best. Rounds 2,3, 7 and 8 are pretty much the only rounds you could give Froch. 1, 4, 5, 6 and 9 were clear Dirrel rounds.

 

The ring mag think devon received an early christmis pressie with his victory

"Devon Alexander may have received an early Christmas gift in his hometown of St. Louis on Saturday."

http://www.ringtv.com/blog/2193/alexander_doesnt_live_up_to_hype_with_kotelnik_victory/

In fact he did so well they demoted him one spot in their ranking :rofl

 

Lets pick more articles out since it seems to be all the fashion these days trying to dig devon out of his hole :hey

http://www.fighthype.com/pages/content8184.html

"KOTELNIK GETS STURM TREATMENT; ROBBED OF VICTORY AGAINST ALEXANDER"


True that

 

I agree that Dirrell was robbed in the UK. I scored the fight to him by 2 points... and that's taking the point deduction into account, so it should have been a three or four point margin in all fairness then, because Froch was at least equally guilty if not more so of infractions than Dirrell was. By round 6, I had noticed Froch blatantly and violently hitting the back of the head at least three times, and the way he threw Dirrell to the canvas was as obvious a point deduction as I've ever seen. How the referee didn't give that I do not know.

 

Oh dear it looks like some boxing fans have eyes in their heads

"Alexander got a present on a night that saw him clearly lose while being punished and out landed according to my eyeballs. I do not understand most present day judges and think the sport has passed many of them by as a few robbed Andriy Kotelnik of a deserving hard fought victory that was not to be."

http://www.myboxingfans.com/2010/08/alexander-beats-kotelnik/

I could go on but i dont think ill bother, dont want to stoop that low (even though it looks like i already have)

 

Oh ok then you persuaded me, one more then

"The 32-year-old from Ukraine was outright robbed.
He beat Alexander to the punch every time, landed the harder shots and was far more accurate. Kotelnik also sported the better defense and was in total control of the fight from the opening bell to the end of the contest."

http://www.secondsout.com/headlines/main-headline/stock-up-stock-down-highway-robbery-in-st-louis

 

It's more like an 8 pack to be fair :yep. Never saw one huh?

3 weight classes to be fair... he hadn't had much succes in HW.
-Holyfield was not in his prime anymore
-Won from that bum on my avatar using PED
-Even though belts are **** these days he didn't held ****
-Schooled by Peter (twice)
-Struggled against Oquendo, got a gift decision
-To old and talked too much **** to do something meaningfull today...

Or did he had succes at HW according to your "ring knowledge"??
In a meaningless era of title belts, even then that piece of lard couldn't held one at HW, at least the bum on my avatar could (twice)

 

Yeah Toney didn't have too much success at HW but the first Peter-Toney fight was a close fight that could've gone either way. Toney looked terrible in the second fight and did get "schooled".

 

You're right about the first fight, but I was making a statement

 

Okay. Keep adding that fuel I love the debates in this thread.

 

:deal Michiganwarrior pwned again

 

Hell, even the local St louis rag was on the case

"Had Kotelnik been awarded the decision, I wouldn’t have complained." :deal

http://www.stltoday.com/sports/colu...cle_9a233160-a2af-11df-81c4-00127992bc8b.html