Dirrell will kill Froch!!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by buckdacious, Jul 5, 2009.


Page 2 of 6
  1. catasyou

    catasyou Lucian Bute Full Member

    38,466
    21
    Apr 7, 2008
    No gameplan.Stood in front of him from round 1.
     
    catasyou, Jul 5, 2009
    catasyou, Jul 5, 2009
    #16
  2. the-demon

    the-demon Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,852
    0
    Jul 26, 2008
    im sure froch will welcome any of the top supermiddles to fight him.
    dirrell is untested at this level...one thing is froch has loads of heart and a super will to win...is dirrell going to be lacking in that department.
     
    the-demon, Jul 5, 2009
    the-demon, Jul 5, 2009
    #17
  3. Beatle

    Beatle Sheer Analysis Full Member

    9,270
    269
    Apr 12, 2009
    I just saw some videos of Dirrell on youtube, and he looks fast and skillful enough to give Froch a boxing lesson.
     
    Beatle, Jul 5, 2009
    Beatle, Jul 5, 2009
    #18
  4. buckdacious

    buckdacious Sin~City punks!!! Full Member

    26,774
    8
    Jul 25, 2008
    yeah but Taylor hasnt KO anybody in 4 years and had him all over the place. even though Direll is untested, I think he has more then Taylor though which could mean Forch KO in 6th. I think Taylor droped in the 4th but let him off the hook
     
    buckdacious, Jul 5, 2009
    buckdacious, Jul 5, 2009
    #19
  5. buckdacious

    buckdacious Sin~City punks!!! Full Member

    26,774
    8
    Jul 25, 2008
    He does have the skills. Forch is decent dont get me wrong, but I think Dirrell just tags that fool all night with Forch hands low all the time
     
    buckdacious, Jul 5, 2009
    buckdacious, Jul 5, 2009
    #20
  6. BremnerBomber

    BremnerBomber Guest

    Well if you take into account who he fought in those years

    Hopkins 2 , Winky, Pavlik, Lacy how many times have these guys been KO'd:huh

    And Froch was pretty composed after he went down, looked over to his corner took the 8 and continued
     
    BremnerBomber, Jul 5, 2009
    BremnerBomber, Jul 5, 2009
    #21
  7. buckdacious

    buckdacious Sin~City punks!!! Full Member

    26,774
    8
    Jul 25, 2008
    well all know that Taylor let Pavilk off the hook and he let Forch off the hook. there was still like 40 seconds on the clock when Forch went down. look all im saying is Dirrell will be the best fighter Forch ever fought and Forch would be the best figher Dirrell has ever fought. but when your hands are down like that your not beating Dirrell. if its not a KO then Forch will lose bad on the cards
     
    buckdacious, Jul 5, 2009
    buckdacious, Jul 5, 2009
    #22
  8. catasyou

    catasyou Lucian Bute Full Member

    38,466
    21
    Apr 7, 2008
    False.
     
    catasyou, Jul 5, 2009
    catasyou, Jul 5, 2009
    #23
  9. Axe

    Axe Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,013
    3
    Jan 23, 2005
    Dirrell is still green.

    We'll see soon enough what he's made of.
     
    Axe, Jul 5, 2009
    Axe, Jul 5, 2009
    #24
  10. nickfoxx

    nickfoxx On The Nod Full Member

    3,211
    1
    Jul 7, 2007
    i'd favor froch in this matchup...

    i've been following the matrix's career and have seen him fight live and frankly i'm not that impressed
     
    nickfoxx, Jul 5, 2009
    nickfoxx, Jul 5, 2009
    #25
  11. buckdacious

    buckdacious Sin~City punks!!! Full Member

    26,774
    8
    Jul 25, 2008
    who the hell is better then Dirrell?? Pascal...:lol::lol::lol:
     
    buckdacious, Jul 5, 2009
    buckdacious, Jul 5, 2009
    #26
  12. catasyou

    catasyou Lucian Bute Full Member

    38,466
    21
    Apr 7, 2008
    Pascal and Taylor yes.

    Dirrell hasn't done anything.

    Potential does NOT equal ability.
     
    catasyou, Jul 5, 2009
    catasyou, Jul 5, 2009
    #27
  13. scilent assasin

    scilent assasin p4p Full Member

    1,016
    2
    Apr 25, 2009

    listen your talking rubbish these are the facts taylor is a more accomplished fighter and got ktfo, froch has one of the best chins in boxing atm and for you to suggest he is going to get ko in the 6th by some unexperienced dude tells me you been watching too much table tennis
     
    scilent assasin, Jul 5, 2009
    scilent assasin, Jul 5, 2009
    #28
  14. ocelot

    ocelot Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,122
    13
    Nov 21, 2007
    Buckdacious is right. Taylor did have Froch in the 4th and blew it. Froch is a very flawed fighter, though obviously a very tough one. Dirrel is an unknown quantity. Obviously the guy has great speed and snap to his punches. But no one can say how he'll respond when he's on the defensive or when forced to fight 12 hard rounds. One thing that benefitted Froch greatly against Taylor is that Froch was the clearly bigger man. With Dirrel, that won't be the case.
     
    ocelot, Jul 5, 2009
    ocelot, Jul 5, 2009
    #29
  15. buckdacious

    buckdacious Sin~City punks!!! Full Member

    26,774
    8
    Jul 25, 2008
    he just got droped by Taylor in the 4th and Taylor couldnt even KO junior middle weights. so to say Dirrell cant KO Forch means you've been watching to much golf!!:lol::lol:
     
    buckdacious, Jul 5, 2009
    buckdacious, Jul 5, 2009
    #30
Page 2 of 6