Discuss CONTEMPORARY (i.e, May 1900) accounts of Jeffries-Corbett I

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by guilalah, Jun 24, 2014.


  1. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,745
    29,123
    Jun 2, 2006
    I've posted the round by rounds Corbett vJeffries fight on this thread,and the quotes from 4 papers the next day.
    I've posted Corbetts manager' s opinion of the Corbett McCoy fight as personally admitted to him by McCoy[faked ] meanwhile you've posted **** all.

    Corbett's manager Geo Considine stated he met McCoy in London a couple of months after the fight and McCoy admitted he laid down for Corbett,he said he assumed Considine knew about it.
    Considine went back to NY and confronted Corbett ,he stated that Corbett at first denied bieng complicit in a fake but after being caught out in a couple of inaccuracies admitted he knew McCoy was going to lay down.

    Considine asked him why he hadnt told him of the fix and Corbett said "what for ? So you could tell Senator Tim Ryan who would make
    McCoy fight on the level as the Senator did with the Maher and McCoy match?
    I didn't know I could lick McCoy on the level, and I was glad to know he was going to lay down"

    Source? The San Francisco Call 3rd Nov 1900.
    As posted .


    "Later that year Corbett scored a five-round
    knockout over the former middleweight champion, Kid McCoy, in
    New York City, which was widely reported as a "fake." Corbett
    always claimed afterward that he fought honestly, but McCoy was
    notoriously devious, and it is likely that he feigned the knockout
    to achieve a betting coup. Dissatisfaction with the outcome of
    this fight was largely responsible for public boxing promotions
    being made illegal in New York from 1901 until 1911"


    "On August 30, 1900, McCoy fought a dubious contest with former World Heavyweight champion James J. Corbett, being counted out in the 5th round, after a performance (or rather lack of ) that raised eyebrows of many present. Although, both Corbett and McCoy protested otherwise, their fight went down in many people’s minds as a fake"


    "August 30 - James J. Corbett KOs Kid McCoy, five rounds, Madison Square Garden. Rumors surface that McCoy took a dive. The question is never satisfactorily answered. The same day the Horton law, governing boxing in New York since 1896, is repealed by the Lewis Law. Boxing will continue in New York on a club membership basis only until 1911"

    "
    By the 20th round, Jeffries' corner was in a panic. Manager Brady dismissed trainer Tommy Ryan from the corner and took charge himself with the simple but direct order, "Knock him out or lose your title!"
    Such words were music to Corbett's ears. All he had to do was stay upright for the last five rounds and he would be Heavyweight Champion once again.
    Jeffries dispensed with trying to box his old mentor and now began to stalk Corbett around the ring, looking for an opening. Corbett danced away from any threat through the 22nd round.
    Midway through the 23rd round, Corbett leaned back to avoid a Jeffries blow, bounced off the ropes and was put on the canvas by a short right hand. The gallant effort was over in a blink of an eye.
    Corbett found himself embraced by the public as never before, after his gallant effort to regain the title. The adoration was short-lived, as his next fight, a five-round knockout over Kid McCoy, was widely believed to be a fix"



    I think you are mentally deranged.:yep
     
  2. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,591
    27,258
    Feb 15, 2006
    You probably could find a newspaper that had Jeffries ahead at the time of the stoppage, but it would not be representative.

    We have to compare as many accounts as possible, and the picture that leaves us with is that Corbett was almost certainly ahead, for whatever that is worth.
     
  3. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,354
    Jun 29, 2007
  4. Boilermaker

    Boilermaker Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,372
    473
    Oct 6, 2004
    Round 1 Corbett.
    Round 2 Corbett.
    Round 3 Corbett.
    Round 4 Jeffries
    Round 5 Even.
    Round 6 Jeffries.
    Round 7 Jeffries.
    Round 8 Jeffries.
    Round 9 Corbett. (Clearly, could this have been a 10 8 with that wording?)
    Round 10 Corbett. Opened up a cut on Jeffries.
    Round 11 Corbett. Clearly again.
    Round 12 Corbett. Closer though, maybe a draw.
    Round 13 Jeffries. He did stagger Corbett at one stage.
    Round 14 Corbett.
    Round 15 Corbett.
    Round 16 Corbett. Seems to be on a good run at the moment.
    Round 17 Jeffries. Big shot landed but workrate did sound lower.
    Round 18 Corbett. Could easily be even, but his workrate sounded more.
    Round 19 Jeffries. Knock down makes it a 10-8, though corbett still landing.
    Round 20 Corbett.
    Round 21 Corbett.
    Round 22 Jeffries. Close, but Corbett starting to weaken.
    Round 23 Jeffries by KO.

    Corbett 13 Jeffries 9 (including KO round) 1 Draw 1.
    Jeffries did have the knockdown to possibly pully him up.

    It seems that Corbett was clearly landing the most regularly from about rounds 9 to 20. Jeffries though did seem to be hitting and landing harder when he did actually land. It is easy to see why Jeffries was said to have been outboxed. I think it was clearly Jim Corbetts fight by the sound of things Round 21, but in saying that, it was a competive fight where Jeffries was in the fight and was still causing Corbett some problems.
     
  5. guilalah

    guilalah Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,355
    306
    Jul 30, 2004
    I once made on old thread on the topic of the NYT report of Jeffries-Corbett I

    Below was my opening post with my interpretation of NYT.

    Maybe others on this thread would like to speculate on rounds winners based on NYT? It would be interesting to see which rounds are consensus, and which we differ upon.




    Also, as apollack said, there's a lot that went into deciding winners aside from rounds won and appearant skill. That's why NYT Sun could say
    This content is protected
    that Corbett made Jeffries look bad
    This content is protected
    say that, had the fight gone the distance, it should have been a draw, a Corbett decision would have been unfair.

    --------




    Round One: I had it for Corbett (1-0 Corbett).

    Round Two: Jeffries, but arguably even (1-1)

    Round Three: Jeffries (2-1, Jeffries)

    Round Four: Decidedly Jeffries (3-1 Jeffries)

    Round Five: Jeffries (Jeffries took the start of the round, Corbett the middle, Jeffries the end) (4-1 Jeffries)

    Round Six: Jeffries (5-1 Jeffries)

    Round Seven: Decidedly Jeffries (6-1 Jeffries) -- however this is the first round where Jeffries is described as punching in a wild manner -- see also rounds 8, 10 and 15

    Round Eight: I gave this to Corbett, though arguments could be made for scoring the round even, or even giving it to Jeffries (6-2 Jeffries)

    Round Nine: Corbett by a fair margin -- borderline two-point round (6-3 Jeffries)

    Round Ten: Decidedly Corbett (6-4 Jeffries)

    Round Eleven: Corbett by a fair margin -- borderline two-point round (6-5 Jeffries)

    Round Twelve: Corbett, but arguably even (6-6) NYT reports there was even betting at this point

    Round Thirteen: Jeffries (7-6 Jeffries)

    Round Fourteen: Corbett (7-7)

    Round Fifteen: Corbett (8-7 Corbett)

    Round Sixteen: Even, but arguably for Jeffries (8-7-1 Corbett)

    Round Seventeen: Jeffries, but arguably even -- both fighters effective, NYT called the round Jeffries' (8-8-1)

    Round Eighteen: Corbett (9-8-1 Corbett)

    Round Nineteen: Jeffries -- Jeffries knocks down Corbett and also generally has the better of the round (9-9-1)

    Round Twenty: Corbett (10-9-1 Corbett)

    Round Twenty-one: Even, but arguable could have been scored for either fighter (10-9-2 Corbett)

    Round Twenty-two: Jeffries -- NYT also states that Corbett was weakening (10-10-2)
     
  6. guilalah

    guilalah Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,355
    306
    Jul 30, 2004
    Pollack's 'In the Ring with James J Jeffries' pp. 390-393 has a lot of comments as to how the bout may have been decided if Corbett had lasted. I don't have time to cite them all right now, but here's one:

    p. 391

    The (New York) Journal said that up to the 20th round, no one in Jeff's corner thought that he would win. "Brady was nearly crazy." ..... "None of Jeffries's friends deny that they are glad the fight did not go to the limit, as a decision on points must have been against their man."
     
  7. guilalah

    guilalah Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,355
    306
    Jul 30, 2004
    Maybe Jeffries body blows land harder in my imagination than they do in Boilermaker's, lol :bbb
     
  8. Boilermaker

    Boilermaker Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,372
    473
    Oct 6, 2004
    :lol: Will have to look at some of those controversial rounds in time when i get the chance.

    Round 12, i think it is could be a game changer. The odds were down to even for this round in the betting for this round, but that does not mean it was even in that particular round! Corbett was the underdog, and he had to be winning the fight (or the round) to close his odds from long odds to even odds. If the fight had been even at this point (during the current rounds), the odds would have been strongly in Jeffries favour since he was expected to both outclass and outfinish Corbett.

    As for those body shots, Corbett took them in sparring for weeks on end when he was world champion. He wasnt wincing, he was play acting:bbb:lol: What is wrong with your imagination.
     
  9. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,745
    29,123
    Jun 2, 2006
    Bottom line Tom Sharkey ,[giving Corbett 6lbs instead of receiving 30lbs ,]performed much better against Corbett but was robbed of a clear cut victory by Corbett's second jumping in the ring when Corbettt was in big trouble and forcing a dsq.
     
  10. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,591
    27,258
    Feb 15, 2006
    That is probably a styles thing though.

    Sharkey applied more sustained pressure than Jeffries, or Fitzsimmons for that matter, and therfore likley had a better style for sealing with Corbett.
     
  11. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,745
    29,123
    Jun 2, 2006
    Sharkey did it in under 9rds, Jeffries went into the 23rd .

    Brady saved Jeff's title by throwing Ryan out of the corner between the 20th and 21st rds and telling Jeff to go in and mix it or lose his crown.

    What was the 30lbs heavier 9 years younger Jeffries thinking of, staying off trying to out box the,cleverer, smaller, older man?
     
  12. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,591
    27,258
    Feb 15, 2006
    Good question.

    Jeffries seems to have had pretensions of being a clever boxer, even early in his career. He was very proud of having out boxed the older Peter Jackson for example. It is possible that his ego just got the better of him.

    Alternatively, perhaps Ryan was the problem, and persisted with his strategy when it was going a over t.
     
  13. guilalah

    guilalah Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,355
    306
    Jul 30, 2004
    Pollack, 'In the Ring ... Jeffries' p. 391

    The (New York) World said ..... (Corbett's) cleverness amazed everyone. However, it also said that up to the knockout it was anybody's fight.
    .....

    The Brooklyn Daily Eagle said that if the fight had been scheduled to a finish, no one would have ever doubted that Jeff would eventually win, but at times during the limited rounds contest, it looked like Corbett might last the distance and win on points.
    "Had the battle ended as the men stood from the fifth to the sixteenth or eighteenth round Corbett would have been entitled to the decision on points .....
    " ..... But from this point the one time champion began to tire, slowly at first and then became so weary it was work for him to hold up his hands ....."
    .....
    Another Eagle writer opined that "barring the knockout blow, it was a certainty that Corbett would receive a decision."
     
  14. Boilermaker

    Boilermaker Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,372
    473
    Oct 6, 2004
    There is lots of talk about Jeffries trying to box Corbett and blaming the early round performance on Ryan or Jeffries change in style. But isnt it more likely that the person who should be blamed is Corbett?

    It seems to me that Corbett was so elusive that Jeffries for a long time couldnt catch him, and couldnt slow him down or hurt him. And Corbett seemed to have no trouble landing from a distance, with blows that probably hurt more than they looked to the observer. Common sense suggests that jeffries would try to Box a bit so as not to get hit. It also seems from the round by round that he worked the body hard, which is a sound tactic when you are unable to hit someone who is so quick and elusive. It was only when Corbett tired that the change in tactics was able to come about.

    At least that is how it plays out in my imagination.


    By the way, how good would Corbett's record have been if all fights were limited to 12 rounds like today.
     
  15. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,354
    Jun 29, 2007
    Right, and if you add in a knockdown 10-8 round, Jeffries was in front prior to the KO.