DLH: Really that dumb or thinks fans are?

Yet you have more posts about Oscar then all 4 of us combined.

 

Yet, I am also the reason the RING magazine has insulted everyone on these messageboards, including you, Geek.

 

When the RING magazine quotes the term "Oscarsexual" I'll give you credit. But until then you are just a deeply confused and angry man, with a dangerous obsession with a man whom you've never met.

 

"Oscarsexual" is a real word!!!! Google it!:yep

 

Oscar needs to fight Winky or retire.:deal

 

So is "Prescott" :yep
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=prescott

"the water is freezing, I've got a prescott" :rofl :rofl :rofl

 

In my case, thats about as opposite as humanly possible. But I love how on other Boxing Forums, people insult Oscar's fanbase by calling the male fans "Oscarsexuals" like you and Mundo.

 

The above is a classic post of an Oscarsexual. It's exactly how they think. He is concerned about Oscars health but nothing about the little guy who's 20 lbs lighter fight night. Typical Bazook! Thanks for sharing.You and Window get along really well I would think.

 

I think they had a May wedding, and vacationed in East LA. They snuck into the GBP building and consumated their marriage in the men's room, stall 4.

 

Fans want good matchups, so of course we can moan and whine when we don't see the fights we want, or if we get mismatches.

DLH just fought the smaller p4p king last year, but at least Mayweather was one weight class below DLH.

Pacquiao has been at least 4 weight classes below DLH for about his whole career. And now it's been lowered in their last fight.....to 15 lbs.

Pacquiao is getting laid out on the canvas.

 

If fans wanted good match ups then they should follow Amateur boxing rather than pro boxing, atleast in the amateurs usally they are equally matched, look you aint going to tell me that Mayweather vs Gatti was a good match up, or that Mayweather vs Mitchell was neither.
in pro boxing you dont always get what you want, Bottom line is the man has had some tuff fights in his career and never ducked nobody he has earned the right to cherry pick.
He has already defined his career though it might not be that great we know where Oscar stands in terms of his legacy its already quite clear, So the man IMO has a right to cherry pick her his career is finished.
Floyd on the other hand, well he can cherry pick through an entire career and some how always seems to have justification for the lack of tuff opposition he chooses.

BTW I dont think Pacquiao gets laid out in this fight, infact I beleive he wins it.

 

Mayweather-Mitchell deserved to be criticized. Merchant interviewed him and talked to him about how Mayweather was talking about fighting guys like Judah, Hatton, and Wright and ended up fighting Mitchell.

Mayweather gets criticized for the Gatti fight too, at least nowadays. He didn't get as much leading up to it, since the main fight everyone wanted to see at 140 at the time was hard to make, and Tszyu was already tied up with Hatton a couple weeks before PBF-Gatti. But after it, people have constantly said "so what? Mayweather beat up a Jersey Punching Bag!"

 

Look honestly from Oscars last performance I beleive Pacquiao has a shot at beating him even though Oscar won each and every round he is starting to show signs of his body breaking down especially with that cheek bone being broken.
I dont think this is such a bad fight after all, infact if Manny were to fight Floyd people wouldnt be making these kinds of threads.

 

Floyd OWNS Oscar's ass inside those ropes and Oscarsexuals have heartburn with that.

 

Okay so what? whats your point? Floyd has a win over DLH and decided to **** Oscar in the rematch big deal.
Margarito Owns Floyd, Gayweathers have to live with that:thumbsup