Do any GGG fans think he could have been competitive against the following:

Yet styles makes fights, he beat better competition.

 

The Hopkins win urinates and defecates on the whole of Bumlovkin's resume.

Stop smoking the Crack.

Roy >>>>> Bumlovkin

 

not everybody are Lucky enough to have a promoter who can by pass all rankings and offer title fight in your 2nd fight...

 

An amateur record is nice and dandy but it means poop in professional boxing. GGG has been fighting over 10 years, ten years.

 

with great certainty he beats Duran, The rest on that list beat him at their prime weights imo.

 

WTF does the Pavlik fight have to do with Hops versus 3G? You're trying to make a comparison based on....KO %?? Wow...that's pretty much the definition of clueless and ignorant to boxing. In this fight, would Hops be dragging 3G up to 170 as well? Because I'm sure in your highly astute analysis, you took that in to consideration.

There was no offer from Hopkins to face 3G. All you'll find is an article from Golden boy saying Hops would face him. In the same article, K2 said they would be open to the idea. There was nothing after that.

What a terrible post from you. You take more liberties then fascist nazis.

 

yes and hes almost undisputed middelweight champ of the world

 

Pavlik's resume is better than Bumlovkin's...

 

-Hagler is a more proven, higher quality, much more refined fighter with better defense and boxing ability, and a titanium chin.
-RJJ is also more proven, and he I feel he beats GGG easier than he beat James Toney. Too much speed, too much talent, just too good. RJJ was P4P#1 in an era loaded with legends. GGG has never been P4P#1 in this era.
-Duran- The only advantage GGG has over Duran is size. That is all. You need more than size to beat Duran.
-Hopkins has every advantage over GGG minus Power. You need more than power to beat Hopkins. The times Hopkin has lost it was against opponents who possessed multiple advantages over Hops.
-Sugar Ray a toss up? Really? which Sugar, the GOAT or the top 10 ATG Sugar. This is ridiculous. Even little Brook was tagging GGG, imagine what a legend arguably in the top 10 would do to Golovkin. LOL
-Toney has every advantage over GGG, and GGG isn't landing cleanly on Toney, that's for damn sure.
-Hearns is an absolute legend and has too much skill, and GGG lacks the 1 punch KO power to put him away. GGG has ONLY a punchers chance in this on and nothing more.
-Joe C would slap the shet out of GGG.

When GGG beats someone remotely close to these legends wake me up. As for now GGG has PROVEN he can beat Contenders, Has beens, Prospects, and bums. Sorry, but that is the truth.


All those fighters mentioned worked their asses off to become who they are, and they did it by fighting the very best, even if it meant compromising weight, size, money.

 

Wow, calm down little fellow and take your medication. You try to act like your unbiased but everyone knows you love and I mean really love Pacquiao and GGG. If you stopped for a second and start using all the good neurons left in your brain you will see that I was making a comparison between two undefeated fighters with a high KO %. I was also referring to people saying GGG would win against Hopkins.

There, was that clear enough. Now shut the hell up and let the grown ups talk.

 

Absolutely he could be competitive. Most of those guys came up from several weight classes to Middleweight.

Aside from being a monster puncher, he has very good fundamentals. He's a tough out in general at 160 lbs.

 

So was Tyson and Hammed, what's your point? By the way, please enlighten us with which elite fighters he's beaten?

 

ggg is of the same breed as these guys end of story...would he beat all of them defenitly not but when i read **** like prime ggg would get destroyed in 2 or 3 rounds

 

tyson and hammed are of the highest level too dont let the barrera fight fool you

 

I can guarantee I'm a lot more unbiased than you are. Tell me this, what crazy comments have I said about 3G, or Pac, for that matter. Got anything? Or was that comment just the usual, message board nonsense like "You're the worst poster EVER!!".

But thanks for your hissy fit child. Now, back to boxing...

how is Pavlik versus Hopkins at 170 ANYTHING like how Hops versus 3G would be at 160. You made the comparison strictly on KO percentage? Are you even aware of the fallacy of trying to use that as a gauge? Let me guess, you never heard the phrase, "Styles make fights", right? You see, Pav and 3G fight nothing alike. So what they have high KO percentages...that means they are the same to you? How the heck do you say this stuff, then try to pretend you have any knowledge on this subject?

Your laughable post was done in crayon and finger paint...and you say let the adult talk?