I know in the past they only used to mention the big three & never used to even acknowledge any of the others which I think is great. I was just wondering if they had started recognising the WBO. Cheers for any information.
Well i believe they considered Holyfields recent challenge to Sultan to be an attempt at winning his 5th heavyweight title... so they regard it as a world title at the very least
Thanks but I meant more in their regular coverage as for example they used to call a fight for the "IBF championship" & when it was a unification of all three it would be "world championship". Do they now flash up on the screen "WBO championship" or is it still ignored?
What do you mean 'recognise' it. Of course they mention it and call it the world championship on the TV, and will recognise it as part of a unification bout, so of course they 'recognise' it. They will call a former WBO champ a former world champion. Same with a present WBO champ. All the belts are meaningless, so why do you think it is great that the USA only used to recognise the 'big three'. WBO actually has a comparitively better list of current champs than IBF and WBA. Ask yourself what exactly makes the IBF any better than the WBO. Its older, but who cares?
So they do now recognise it. Thats all I needed to know thanks. Totally can't be bothered with another hair splitting discussion about the various alphabets.:good
Because people are smart enough to realise that any alpahabet champ can be garbage, and will only call for a unification in a splintered division or one which has two top fighters in it. Nobody wants Calzaghe to fight Bute for the IBF because he is the man at 168 and Bute is a paper champ. Sometimes, the WBO champ is recognised as the best in the weightclass and does not need to go after the WBC champ. The belts are pretty much meaningless.
To me, the WBO which may have lacked a bit of credibility due to Bowe treating it like **** in the early to mid 90s began to garner a bit of respect amongst Americans after Lamon Brewster won it back in 2004. Back then, many considered him to be the best American heavyweight and certainly the most exciting...its worth seemed to increase after that. That being said, seeing as the golden boy saw fit to claim to be a 6 weight world champion having held the belt at 130 and 160, the Americans really have had no choice to acknowledge it as a legit world title otherwise they can't hype DLH as having been a champ at those two divisions.
True. I think the WBO heavyweight title has been a separate entity as it really has a poor history. Bowe had to treat it like **** to get back into contention for the real title I believe.