Do think James Kirkland should fight at 160?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Vincent Gottschalk, Dec 25, 2009.


Page 3 of 3
  1. Vincent Gottschalk

    Vincent Gottschalk Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,020
    4
    Feb 16, 2005
    I read somewere he getting out in 2010:happy
     
    Vincent Gottschalk, Dec 26, 2009
    Vincent Gottschalk, Dec 26, 2009
    #31
  2. ed7890

    ed7890 Col. Hunter Gathers Full Member

    8,170
    0
    Apr 4, 2009
    No way, i thought he got 2-3 years. It'll be good to get him back in the mix.
     
    ed7890, Dec 26, 2009
    ed7890, Dec 26, 2009
    #32
  3. BOGART

    BOGART Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,903
    259
    Jul 19, 2004
    With middleweight being on the thin side I always thought it would be nice to see Kirkland and Angulo both move up but after they became two of the top guys at 154. It wouldn't be a bad move for Kirland if he did move up. 154 has more depth than 160 but middleweight has Pavlik and Williams looming as big money fights, jr middle just doesn't have the big money fights that those two represent. Kirkland seems a bit short for some of the taller middlweights but I'll be glad just to see him in the ring again, he was an exciting fighter.
     
    BOGART, Dec 26, 2009
    BOGART, Dec 26, 2009
    #33
Page 3 of 3