My question is: are we actually able to nominate someone to mod (somehow)? Cause there is a lot of talk and I say lets do it! My vote would go to KG, Brooklyn, Decebal, McGrain. They seem to be objective and level headed from the forum cruising I have done. Decebal claims he doesn't know **** but I still think he would make a good mod
Decebal would be good, although you couldn't let him near the lounge. I think that Mods have basically been done away with. There is one listed for Classic and one listed for Lounge, and this has been the case for some time - it used to be the case that 4 guys were moding in here. For whatever reason, Mod's have been done away with. I think one rule change would make a huge change - make guys wait one hundred posts before they can open a thread. The only loss is those "hello my name is" threads in the lounge, and those boys aren't having any fun right now with the general attitudes in there
the last group of mods (except for achilles, where is he?) sucked, they were all very biased and would ban posters they have disagreements with, remember when scar used to delete all negative threads about pbf?
re·lent·less play_w("R0139200") (r This content is protected -l This content is protected nt This content is protected l This content is protected s)adj.1. Unyielding in severity or strictness; unrelenting: relentless persecution. 2. Steady and persistent; unremitting: the relentless beat of the drums
What? My ass would be banned instantly because I am on his "psuedocredible poster that hates Pacman" list
An ignore feaure would kill this board. The FLoyd-ites, the Calzaghuggers, Cottophiles and Klistsckomaniacs would all be stuck agreeing with one another. Seriously though, a moderator would be kept busy with the ban button of late.