Do you agree that Boxing needs more personalities?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by tommyg6, Sep 19, 2017.


  1. tommyg6

    tommyg6 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,395
    1,520
    May 30, 2015
    cuz there's too many robots in boxing atm.

    Say what you will about guys like Tyson Fury, Saunders, Tony Bellew, Broner, etc..
    at least these guys can talk and get people talking about them. I'm a fan of good ole fashion trash talk & banter. it makes me more interested in their fights & see if they can back up their trash talk; and if they can, even more better.

    and look at Conor McGregor, he's the biggest name in combat sports just cuz the guy is a dick, loves being a dick and runs his mouth. same could be said for like minded fighters.



    do you agree boxing needs more personalities?
     
    Last edited: Sep 19, 2017
  2. Sir Will Wigan

    Sir Will Wigan HLF: A Real "Fightin' Man" Full Member

    3,936
    415
    Jan 16, 2011
    Not only does boxing not need the likes of Adrian Broner, society doesn't either.
     
  3. oiky

    oiky Gypsy Boy Full Member

    4,578
    1,621
    Jan 17, 2014
    Boxing is better with the likes of Tyson fury
     
  4. tealt

    tealt Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,867
    3,878
    Mar 24, 2017
    I think we need better fights like this year not personalities. Personalities who become popular end up only fighting for big money fights and nothing else are bad for boxing.
     
  5. Ukansodoff

    Ukansodoff Deontay plz stop ducking Joshua. Thank you. Full Member

    10,980
    6,712
    Aug 7, 2010
    Every sport and every other walk of life could always do with more personalities. Conor McGregor only had 1 fight, lost it miserably and i already miss him.
     
  6. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,839
    83,609
    Nov 30, 2006
    As in...more contrived personalities, contrived sheerly for the sake of having "personalities", like WWE?

    No thanks, horrible idea.
     
    UnleashtheFURY likes this.
  7. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,839
    83,609
    Nov 30, 2006
    I mean, if we're going to assume that every single boxing fan on the planet is either a small child (the demographic that reads comic books and maybe watches pro wrestling either with or without permission from their parents) or have the intellect, attention span and maturity level of that age group, then yes. This is a wonderful idea.

    Otherwise, no, sorry, a few us are grownups.
     
  8. dellboi94

    dellboi94 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,111
    1,680
    Sep 3, 2013
    Depends, I like guys like Carl Froch, he's a brilliant troll and an excellent wind up merchant with a dry sense of humour.
     
    Last edited: Sep 19, 2017
  9. Max Thunder

    Max Thunder Proud member of the Cult of Vikings Full Member

    7,017
    11,665
    Apr 25, 2017
    If they are different kind of personalities. 5 davidhayes in one division would be nightmarish.
     
  10. JeremyCorbyn

    JeremyCorbyn Active Member Full Member

    742
    776
    Jul 15, 2017
    I don't care what anyone says, when two top guys with big personalities clash, as long as the public believe it they will tune in. Even if they don't believe it, they will probably still tune in.

    If a boxer wants to make more money, then they need to develop a personality, doesn't matter if the public love you or hate you, as long as they are tuning in. So yes, personalities are healthy for boxing and the boxer.

    It is actually more important for boxing than any other individual sport, because other sports have annual tournaments around the same time every year, so fans know when to tune in, pro boxing doesn't, so it is the boxers responsibility to draw them in. (and promoters of course).

    You look at Canelo v GGG, both of them are appalling at selling a fight, maybe not their own fault, but if their fight hasn't sold well then it is nothing to do with Floyd/Conor, it is down to them.