Do you agree with Bert Sugar saying Mike Tyson career wasnt good enough to make the top 100 p4p ATG?

20-24 year old Tyson while Overrated by many as far as far as legacy… was H2H top 10 HW imo. But that’s it. After that Tyson wasn’t top 20.

 

The question was his overall career which you could argue a reason for him not being in. If you take his prime then yes he should be included. I think it should be judged on a fighters career when it comes to rankings. Being the most dangerous man on the planet for a period of time is different to having the best career. It would be very interesting to see how a prime pfp list stacks up against a career pfp list IMO. If a fighters name is near the top of both then they are truly a great. Tyson, although great in his prime, would be let down by his overall career. Although there are genuine reasons they are irrelevant.