Do you agree with these Tiers of Greatness for 90s-00s fighters?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by horst, Jul 5, 2011.


  1. Ncc84

    Ncc84 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,709
    2
    Oct 14, 2009
    How can lennox lewis be in anything other than tier 1?!
     
  2. horst

    horst Guest

    Just want to re-post this, in case anyone missed the final shaming of this piece of ****:



    This content is protected




    :rofl:rofl:rofl

    Hope they ban this ****ing cretin, the forum would be a better place with another rancid troll exiled for good. :deal
     
  3. horst

    horst Guest

    :lol: How lame. Sorry, but you're far too late to defend your chum, he got finished on here in absolutely brutal fashion by me yesterday, the nail has already been well and truly hammered into that coffin. I have nothing else to say on the subject, so unless you have a constructive comment to make about the Tiers system, don't let the door hit you on the way out.
     
  4. HEADBANGER

    HEADBANGER TEAM ELITE GENERAL Full Member

    13,630
    655
    Oct 17, 2009


    its a real shame bailey because everytime i ask popkins a relevant boxing question in a thread, he gets all scared and defensive, refusing to answer it because he worries that i will make him look a **** again.

    popkins is happy to debate with anyone he thinks he can walk all over but when he gets a tough question that will contradict his opinion, he would rather duck it, and change the topic of debate by going off on an elaborate tangent to deflect posters away from the fact that he wouldn't answer the original relevant question. these elaborate tangents generally lead to him starting a petty new thread about one small irrelevant aspect of the previous thread. this is precisely why silencer labelled popkins "a pissy little poster".

    at the minute popkins kind of reminds me of floyd mayweather with the way he ducks, his solid weeks of continued cutting and pasting response to my questions is his equivalent of floyd saying "take the test" :lol:. he would rather throw his whole thread into chaos than answer the relivant question posed.










    This content is protected
     
  5. HEADBANGER

    HEADBANGER TEAM ELITE GENERAL Full Member

    13,630
    655
    Oct 17, 2009


    wait till you here that fragile popkins ranks sam langford higher in his all-time heavyweight rankings than lennox lewis :lol:

    he earlier ducked debating this point with 'luf' :rofl
     
  6. HEADBANGER

    HEADBANGER TEAM ELITE GENERAL Full Member

    13,630
    655
    Oct 17, 2009


    :lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:
     
  7. horst

    horst Guest

    :rofl Seriously?

    Hopkins was years past his best and had glaring stamina issues, Calzaghe 'beat' him the same way that Jermain Taylor did (unconvincing and unimpressive workrate-based SD)... 3 years after Jermain Taylor did it.

    Jones was absolutely shot to smithereens, more shot than Sonny Corleone in Godfather 1, Calzaghe's win over him was one of the most meaningless mismatches in modern boxing history.


    You register surprise that Calzaghe is in Tier 4, when he beat two Tier 1 fighters. I think the naivety of your reaction can be conveyed by asking you this question:

    Oliver McCall holds wins over Larry Holmes and a prime Lennox Lewis. Does that automatically make Oliver McCall one of the tier 1 heavyweights of the 1980s and 90s?

    Of course not. There is much more to consider than that. :deal
     
  8. horst

    horst Guest

    Just want to re-post this, in case anyone missed the final shaming of this piece of ****:



    This content is protected




    :rofl:rofl:rofl

    Hope they ban this ****ing cretin, the forum would be a better place with another rancid troll exiled for good. :deal
     
  9. horst

    horst Guest

    Just want to re-post this, in case anyone missed the final shaming of this piece of ****:



    This content is protected




    :rofl:rofl:rofl

    Hope they ban this ****ing cretin, the forum would be a better place with another rancid troll exiled for good. :deal
     
  10. Ncc84

    Ncc84 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,709
    2
    Oct 14, 2009
    You and popkins have been throwing insults at each other, but to say he is the sort of boxing fan who ranks Sam Langford higher than Lewis is going too far!
     
  11. horst

    horst Guest

    Langford obviously ranks light years higher than Lewis overall, considering Langford is one of the only 4 fighters in history to have a legitimate case for the GOAT position IMO, the others being Robinson, Greb and Armstrong.

    At heavyweight, Langford's best wins are light years ahead of Lewis's, all things considered. Langford's wins over Tiger Flowers and Harry Wills are among the best in heavyweight history.

    Add in the fact that Langford was often giving up serious weight, while Lewis was the one enjoying huge size advantages more often than not.

    However, Luf and I have since had a conversation about this, and I can accept Lewis does have the superior heavyweight career, so I was maybe a bit off-base with that comment. I still think Langford has a legit case, but on balance I probably would go with Lewis.

    I can always easily admit when I've called something wrong, not a problem for me. I'm such a huge believer in Langford's ATG p4p brilliance that I often get a bit over-enthusiastic about him. :good
     
  12. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,365
    21,813
    Sep 15, 2009
    come on bailey, i know your capable of good posts from time to time, this trolling **** needs to stop.
     
  13. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,365
    21,813
    Sep 15, 2009
    p.s. i agree with langford's p4p prowess.

    and i'll say this here hoping no greb apologists see this but i think langford has the best resume in the history of boxing (hopefully in the general people won't know who i'm comparing and noone will shoot me down :good )
     
  14. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    39,975
    3,107
    Dec 11, 2009
    Calzaghe didnt beat Hopkins on workrate, he beat Hopkins because Calzaghe was able to land his left more often than Hopkins could land his right.
    If you take Taylors 2 fight scorecards against Hopkins, his clear points of victory overall werent as much as Calzaghe scored in 1 fight with Hopkins :lol:.
    Hopkins was coming on strong against Taylor, but against Calzaghe Hopkins was looking for time out.

    Tier 1 Calzaghe :smoke
     
  15. HEADBANGER

    HEADBANGER TEAM ELITE GENERAL Full Member

    13,630
    655
    Oct 17, 2009


    You look at hopkins and you ask, what are his best wins



    trinidad
    prime weight = welterweight (147)
    fought hopkins at middleweight (159) :deal
    trinidads record at middleweight or above from hopkins onwards = 2 wins / 3 defeats.

    winky wright
    prime weight - light middleweight (154)
    fought hopkins at - 170 lbs :deal
    in 57 fights, the hopkins fight was the only fight that wright had weighed over 160 lbs (a full 10lbs difference)

    de la hoya
    prime weight - welterweight (140lbs)
    fought hopkins at - middleweight (160lbs) :deal
    de la hoya only fought twice in his career at middleweight out of 45 fights -1 win / 1 loss - the win was a very debatable decision over eurobum felix sturm

    pavlik
    prime weight - middleweight (160 lbs)
    fought hopkins at - 170 lbs :deal
    in 34 fights pavlik had only fought 2 minnions at the beginning of his career at 169. all pavliks fights since hopkins have been at the 160 limit.

    tarver
    prime weight 175
    great 2 weight jump from hopkins and his best win despite tarver being a b-level fighter and going 3 wins / 3 losses from hopkins onwards.

    johnson
    prime weight -super mid / light heavy (162 to 175)
    fought hopkins at - middleweight (160)
    johnsons record at 160 + from hopkins onwards - 19 wins / 14 defeats / 2 draws
    the defeats have come against people of the level of ottke, woods, shieka, gonzales, harmon, branco, vanderpool, Kiwanuka, sosa :lol:

    pascal
    prime weight - 175
    fought hopkins - 175
    considering hopkins age, this is a good victory at the 2nd time of asking against an opponent that was beaten much more convincingly by carl froch.




    you look at this and think that hopkins best win were against

    - trinidad - a welterweight who's best victory at middleweight or above was against joppy (who has an extremely poor winning resume)

    - tarver - an extremely overated light heavyweight who was weight drained after filming rocky

    you have to score hopkins high for longjevity but there have been 8 occasions where hopkins has stepped into the ring and not been good enough to win the fight. do these type of victories really warrant hopkins being put on the same level as manny paquiao, a fighter that has beaten morales, barrera, marquez, de la hoya, hatton, cotto, de la hoya, margarito during an 8 weight span.

    the only conclusion i can come up with is that anyone who wants to put hopkins on the same tier as pacquiao is clearly delusional.