Do you agree with these Tiers Of Greatness for the best MMA fighters ever?

Discussion in 'MMA Forum' started by horst, Jul 31, 2011.


  1. Will Cooling

    Will Cooling Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,170
    0
    Aug 2, 2010
    If its laughable, then its laughable to have the likes of Jack Johnson in boxing heavyweight top ten. Shamrock can't fight people who came after he retired - when ranking between different eras you have to primarily consider a fighters place within his era. Throughout the nineties Shamrock fought pretty much everybody and his last UFC run some him dominant a division despite being undersized, ending his reign by beating the man who would then go on to have the longest title reign in UFC history to that point.
     
  2. horst

    horst Guest

    I don't really understand your post mate. You can't rank someone as an elite of MMA, because they perhaps could've/would've beaten great fighters. You can only rank guys on what they actually did do in reality, and in reality Shamrock may have been a great fighter in terms of ability, but he did not prove it against top competition the way that Fedor and GSP did, so IMO he cannot be considered their equal.

    I actually don't rate Jack Johnson very highly myself, but say you had said Sam Langford instead, who was from the same era. I rate Langford very highly because he beat great fighters, guys that we know were great from what they achieved in the ring. Shamrock did not do so to the same degree. He did not beat a lot of proven great fighters, the way that Langford did, so it's not comparable.

    And so far in this post, I haven't even broached the issue that Shamrock didn't have his last fight until 2009, is actually younger than Dan Henderson, and therefore had ample opportunity to spend his 30s fighting all of the great competition available in the 2000s, and didn't.


    As things stand, Shamrock's best wins are an MD over Bas Rutten in 1994 Pancrase (twice avenged), Tito Ortiz, Jeremy Horn, and, er...

    You're telling me that a win resume like this merits being positioned alongside guys like Fedor, Anderson and GSP, and above guys like Hendo, Wanderlei, Penn and Saku?

    Come off it man. That's completely unjustifiable. :nono
     
  3. Stoo

    Stoo Obsessed with Boxing banned

    25,846
    1
    Apr 4, 2008
    Ok I want to play this game to

    So Fedor's best wins are Nog, Cro Cop and errrr Sylvia who lost to a 45 year old Randy, Arlovski who gets ko'd by a breeze and Marc Coleman who lost to Pete Williams and Takada. I guess Fedor has the edge over Frank because Shamrock was beating a load of cans in between big fights with the likes of Bas, Funaki Horn and Tito. Fedor would never do that would he....

    GSP has beaten Matt Hughes in his 46th fight and little ole BJ (and Penn's win over Hughes is dismissed because it was twiced avenged according to your rules. And one of Bas' wins was a cut stoppage, so Fedor now has 4 loses) who beat him senseless for a round and guys like Fitch and Shields who are a testament to the leaps and bounds that MMA has evolved since Shamrock was fighting one dimensional guys....

    Get the point or shall I go through the rest of the guys on your list, Frank deserves to be there. You've got Rampage and Randy in tier 3 for ****s sake
     
  4. horst

    horst Guest

    You're way off this time Stoo. No way in hell does Shamrock deserve to be Tier 1.

    Fedor's top 12 wins (not in order):

    Nogueira I
    Nogueira III
    Crocop
    Coleman I
    Coleman II
    Sylvia
    Arlovski
    Hunt
    Randleman
    Goodridge
    Fujita
    Herring
    ...


    GSP's top 12 wins (not in order):

    Hughes II
    Hughes III
    Penn I
    Penn II
    Fitch
    Shields
    Koscheck I
    Koscheck II
    J Miller
    Parisyan
    Serra II
    Trigg
    ...


    Frank Shamrock's top 12 wins:

    Ortiz
    Horn
    Rutten
    Funaki
    ...
    Take your pick from old Baroni, Cesar Gracie's only ever pro fight, Elvis Sinosic, a DQ over Enson Inoue, etc etc etc.



    Come on man, you CANNOT argue this is a Tier 1 resume. This is bull**** here. Bull****! :deal
     
  5. Stoo

    Stoo Obsessed with Boxing banned

    25,846
    1
    Apr 4, 2008
    I didnt say tier 1 fella, my point is you can pick apart everyone's resume and I think you are being a tad unfair on Shamrock here tbh.

    Case in point you got Coleman x2 on Fedors resume, but Frank beat Kevin Jackson, Olympic Champion and UFC Champ in 16 seconds. Now of course you can make a claim that Coleman is more of a legit fighter in MMA, but he was the same 1 dimensional guy with no stand up and a **** gas tank in his 1st fight, and he was the same guy in his last. Point is he beat a better wrestler much quicker than Fedor did.

    And you going to bring up Cesar Gracie, well Hong Man Choi's best win is Jose Conseco ffs

    I honestly think Frank is a tier 3 guy fella, but his resume does let him down but he's got more title defences in a row than Randy & Rampage and beat the best that was put in front of him, and was a pioneer in the same respect that Saku was interms of raising the standard and bringing something new to the game, that deserves credit. Before and after Frank, the MW/LHW was dominated by lay n pray.

    I think tier 3 is fair, but it's your list
     
  6. horst

    horst Guest

    Well the whole argument was that he should be in Tier 1, that's what I was arguing against, not the inclusion of him in any tier.

    If you think he should be in tier 3, I have no problem with that. I don't agree, but I think it's a perfectly valid call, I wouldn't have bothered arguing to the contrary.

    Will Cooling had him in Tier 1 ahead of Nogueira, Henderson, Penn, Wanderlei and Sakuraba, that was what I was arguing quite vehemently against, nothing else.
     
  7. horst

    horst Guest

    As things stand, I think I'd have Frank Shamrock, Takanori Gomi and Tito Ortiz in Tier 4. Will have a think about some others. Josh Barnett was a very, very good fighter as well I think.
     
  8. Stoo

    Stoo Obsessed with Boxing banned

    25,846
    1
    Apr 4, 2008
    Maybe I should have stated that at the start :lol: But I think Frank deserves respect, the man was the best American MMA fighter in the world during the period when no one was watching and guys like Koscheck Sylvia and Goodridge are being used as good wins on the resume of others, when they aint half the MMA fighter Frank is. He could easily be a Tier 2 if he was in the mix as a 185er his prime today. But I know that point is moot in terms of the criteria for this list
     
  9. Flash Jab

    Flash Jab Boxing Junkie banned

    12,335
    0
    Jul 29, 2010
    It's crazy to see how much people are getting into ATG and rankings and disputing wins. Settle down, fellas. :p
     
  10. Chempasillo

    Chempasillo Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,431
    1
    Feb 5, 2011

    all I wanted too know :lol: for me it is also Fedor :happy
     
  11. horst

    horst Guest

    Nothing the matter with a bit of spirited debate Flash!
     
  12. Stoo

    Stoo Obsessed with Boxing banned

    25,846
    1
    Apr 4, 2008
    Pointless talking about the sport really if that's the case. May as well shut down the forum and let the ''**** Zuffa'' ******s take over then. May aswell rename this place, Im thinking Sherdog is catchy as a name for a forum :lol:

    Serious question, would you rather read a debate between two people who know what they are talking about or endless +1's and War Overeems

    Think about it
     
  13. Stoo

    Stoo Obsessed with Boxing banned

    25,846
    1
    Apr 4, 2008
    +1 yea bro I agree

    WAAAAAAAAAAR 209!
     
  14. Flash Jab

    Flash Jab Boxing Junkie banned

    12,335
    0
    Jul 29, 2010
    Fair point. Where you both left off. :good
     
  15. Will Cooling

    Will Cooling Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,170
    0
    Aug 2, 2010
    As I said, I wasn't arguing head to head or depth of resume but ATG ranking. That to me has to be based on how dominant a fighter was in their era and not penalize them too harshly for being unlucky to fight in a weak era. I know Shamrock came back but due to the overtraining and more importantly oversparring that was rife in the sport in the nineties he was physically spent at a young age. The Strikeforce and EliteXC fights were unashamed cash-ins and helped grow the sport in California (as did his founding of AKA).

    For his time Shamrock was awesome. Beat top competition in both America and Japan, retired with the belt after beating the man who would become his long-term successor and expanding the concept of the sport through developing things like cross-training.

    But as I said H2H and resume depth there are many fighters better than him because the sport developed and improved after he retired in 2000. Just in the same way as the fighters Hughes and Emelianenko defeated would struggle if they were sucked out of the early noughties and dropped into modern-day UFC without any chance to adjust to a changed level of competition.