Do you always judge a fighter by its resume?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by FINITO, Mar 23, 2009.


  1. Sweet Pea

    Sweet Pea Obsessed with Boxing banned

    27,199
    101
    Dec 26, 2007
    There are always extentuating circumstances, such as if the fighter fought in a weak era/division, was constantly avoided, has an incomplete record, or simply didn't get the breaks needed to really shine. In that case, I'll base my judgement off of what I've seen of him and where I believe he rates ability wise.
     
  2. FINITO

    FINITO Boxing Junkie banned

    8,773
    2
    Jan 29, 2009
    :clap: Great answer.
     
  3. bladerunner

    bladerunner El Intocable Full Member

    33,921
    136
    Jul 20, 2004
    Valero poor resume and no skills .
     
  4. My2Sense

    My2Sense Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,935
    100
    Aug 21, 2008
    You need to look at every aspect of a fighter before you can judge him. Resume may be the best criteria, but not the only one.
     
  5. Royal-T-Bag

    Royal-T-Bag Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,661
    4
    Jan 6, 2008
    easy because Gamboas level of competition almost surpasses Valero's already and he's only been a pro for 2 years. Gamboas level of competition in relation to his number of fights is unbeleivable. he's being moved quicker than any prospect in recent memory. the win loss ratio of gamboas opponents is far greater than that of Valero's.
     
  6. billyk

    billyk Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,494
    1
    Oct 19, 2008
    If I've seen a lot of a fighter then I don't care too much about his resume, I'll orm an opinion of him based on what I've seen. If I'm not familiar with someones fights then the resume is all you can go on.

    It is the fighter that makes the resume, not the other way round.
     
  7. trampie

    trampie Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,230
    3
    Oct 18, 2008
    im thinking Joe Calzaghe
     
  8. trampie

    trampie Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,230
    3
    Oct 18, 2008
    im still thinking Joe Calzaghe
     
  9. bladerunner

    bladerunner El Intocable Full Member

    33,921
    136
    Jul 20, 2004
    great post too bad that the thread starter is too dumb to understand that.
     
  10. trampie

    trampie Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,230
    3
    Oct 18, 2008
    Calzaghe's head to head ability is much better than his resume, the same as Pretty Boy Floyd, both were very hard to beat, both would fail to make a top 30 all time list although both are unbeaten, you have say in both cases if they came out of retirement no current boxer would beat them, a couple would have a chance but if i am honest i say no current boxer beats them. {Floyd has been retired for a while now and Joe is 37 with shot hands yet nobody beats them, are they just too good or is the current state of boxing bad ?}
     
  11. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member

    79,438
    2,647
    Feb 1, 2007
    I judge a fighter by what i see in the ring. For fights where that isn't available then boxrec and fightnews is usually my #2.

    Valero is a good fighter.
     
  12. Silvermags

    Silvermags Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,268
    0
    Oct 28, 2007
    FORGET the resume.. After mosqueda there is nothing to talk about VALERO!

    Valero beat Mosqueda (THAT's about it guys! ) :lol::patsch...

    after that JEFF M believes he can beat them all!!!!! PAC,JMM hatton etc...

    :lol::lol::lol:
     
  13. sprika2

    sprika2 Active Member Full Member

    1,211
    0
    Apr 28, 2006
    no. by a fighters potential
     
  14. asero

    asero Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,376
    309
    Jan 8, 2009
    the should be a balance between resume and overall ability...again, juanma lopez is top 15