Do you consider Tyson Fury and Anthony Joshua to be all time greats ?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by MarkusFlorez99, Sep 22, 2025 at 1:03 AM.


?

This poll will close on Jun 18, 2028 at 1:03 AM.
  1. Yes

    5.3%
  2. Lol no

    94.7%
  1. MaccaveliMacc

    MaccaveliMacc Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,453
    6,692
    Feb 27, 2024
    Yeah, he was 17 months younger. But still he was 39 and 3 years out of his prime, unmotivated and his wife going crazy.
     
  2. Rico Spadafora

    Rico Spadafora Master of Chins Full Member

    45,378
    3,788
    Feb 20, 2008
    Absolutely not. Neither had any longevity at the top even in a mediocre era. AJ has No Chin and one of the lowest Ring IQ’s for a champion I can remember. Fury is a feather fisted mentally unstable fighter who once he got to the top couldn’t handle it. Say what you want about fighters like Holmes and Klitschko’s eras but they were able to bring it for years on end and not have the lapses that AJ and Fury did. It’s not easy to do that even in weak or mediocre eras to be able to get up and win every fight. Fury and AJ couldn’t do that.
     
  3. Redbeard7

    Redbeard7 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,289
    2,331
    Oct 9, 2022
    Wlad was either the most motivated he'd ever been or at least since the Haye fight:

    https://www.boxingforum24.com/threads/wlad-was-dying-for-a-rematch-with-fury.696499/#post-22075784

    If it had been a razor close 7-5 or whatever there'd be a strong case that a younger Wlad wins. But he was out of his depth for 11.5 rounds.

    Joshua and Wilder's teams weren't even thinking about fighting Wlad in 2015, which says a lot in itself.
     
  4. Redbeard7

    Redbeard7 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,289
    2,331
    Oct 9, 2022
    You'd rather get punched by prime Holmes than prime Fury if you have any sense.
     
  5. MaccaveliMacc

    MaccaveliMacc Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,453
    6,692
    Feb 27, 2024
    Well, AJ wasn't even a Top 10 guy when Klitschko was the champ. He was 2 years into his pro career and only had 14 fights. He still fought him being 3.5 years pro in his 19th fight. It took Fury 7 years and 25 fights to challenge Wlad. Wilder ducking Klitschko is a stuff of legends tho. 8 year pro, WBC titlist, 33 fights under his belt, but still "a baby", lol.
     
  6. Rico Spadafora

    Rico Spadafora Master of Chins Full Member

    45,378
    3,788
    Feb 20, 2008
    Fury is feather fisted. He has no actual power especially for his size.
     
    MaccaveliMacc likes this.
  7. MaccaveliMacc

    MaccaveliMacc Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,453
    6,692
    Feb 27, 2024
  8. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist

    26,682
    17,736
    Apr 3, 2012
  9. NewChallenger

    NewChallenger Member Full Member

    361
    329
    Oct 17, 2020
    I dont even consider Usyk an all time great, so how do you think Fury And AJ are rated to me?
     
  10. CroBox29

    CroBox29 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,054
    5,710
    Nov 24, 2019
    I don't have any of them in the Top 20.
     
  11. Boxed Ears

    Boxed Ears this my daddy's account (RIP daddy) Full Member

    56,128
    10,541
    Jul 28, 2009
    Short answer, no.
    Long answer, are they arguably between the top 20-30 heavyweights, yes, if that's how far you're willing to grant ATG status, considering the age of the division. Unlike Usyk, these aren't guys I'm ever going to rate p4p anywhere of note. But you have to consider that Usyk himself thinks he's better than Vitali but not Fury and AJ. So, that should change everyone's lists, frankly.
     
  12. leftsmoke

    leftsmoke New Member Full Member

    24
    15
    Jul 8, 2025
    Fury I would probably give the nod if I thought about it long enough. With Joshua I just can't get over the thought of him doing some stupid every day thing like dropping his car keys and somebody yelling "brilliant, AJ!" in response. Blame UK fight media.
     
    MarkusFlorez99 likes this.