Do you still consider the wba a legit top sanctioning body?

The WBA is clearly the worst sanctioning organization. Although the others have flaws, they are nowhere near the WBA's low level of incompetence and absurdity.

- making Hasim Rahman (BoxRec #64 at HW) the heavyweight mandatory

- not having eliminators at heavyweight

- recycling Ruiz and Valuev for years

- having all the "world" "interim" and "super" champions without having them fight each other

- not forcing Sturm or N'Jikam to fight Golovkin

- letting Guillermo Jones go two years without a title defense

 

lol at the poll

 

They are a joke, they all suck.

 

The WBA is garbage. They've turned themselves into a complete laughing stock. ******s.

 

Despite wll the **** both oraganisations get the WBC and WBA (along with the IBF) are the belts to have when it comes to world titles.

 

It's fkn **** super regular.......shld have small too like maccas

 

It is almost sad to say but the WBA is nowadays by far and away the most corrupt and useless organisation out there.
WBC is highly currupt as well.

Who knew that the 2 newer organisations would become the more valid ones.
That said they are still pretty bad.

 

Yes, greatly legit.

 

WBA is the worst of all. Even IBO is more legit, in my opinion.

 

No, the WBA reeks of corruption, ****, & shitty corruption. :barf

 

Powerful tautology.