The one who got beaten by Wlad will try to fight Vitali next and the one who got beaten by Vitali will try to fight Wlad next (Haye, Adamek, and others who've got beaten by the K2 already) Don't you think this is a farce? The Klitschko brothers are at the same level as the fighters since they both are very big, strong, and dangerous. I mean that If you can't beat Wlad then don't expect that you will be able to beat Vitali and vice versa. The HW Division with the domination of the K2 is making people turn their backs on it so they both should stop doing this ****. Try to find strong and tough fighters and fight them.
The problem is your last sentence. Who do you suggest? Oh and money, they (understandably) like money.
They are different fighters with different styles. Just because you lost to another doesn’t mean you can’t fight against another one
the only problem is that the contenders who can actually make a good matchup with either K bro consider themselves too "green" ( Fury, Helenius before he was injured, Wach) and want to wait for age to catch-up on Wlad and Vitali
You hear some posters moaning that one Klitchko will dodge a fighter cos the borther has fought him. Then another (you) saying they don't have to fight someone cos there brother has already fought them. I think they are differant fighters. And just cos you lose to one, dont mean you can't beat the other.
:deal Differences: Wlad has huge punchingpower, Vitali has good power. Wlad has a shaky chin, Vitali has an amazing chin. Wlad has good output, Vitali has high output. Wlad goes straight back when attacked, Vital moves to the side or holds ground.
None of those guys stand a chance against KlitBros... they would be outboxed way too easily, every minute of every round, especially that walking turd Sloth Wach.
No, but this thread is. Vitali struggles with movement, Wlad struggles with pressure. Why would losing to one brother rule you out of a fight with the other? Is rematching & avenging each others losses (a la Sanders & Byrd) a farce? Is paying peanuts & having multiple rematch clauses (also for peanuts) against both brothers a farce? Is using tame referees who allow excessive & illegal holding a farce?
Just wanna see them both fight the top guys who are winning. For instance....Chisora gave Vitali his toughest fight since Lewis.....IMO, should he string together say 5 wins over the likes of Fury, Dimitrenko or even just toss a couple eurocans like Bydenko and Petkovic...and he'd make for an interesting fight with Wlad as well. If Chambers beat Adamek this summer, and maybe gets another decent top tier win I'd like to see how well Vitali could do him.:think
it would be an even worse mismatch than Adamek - Vitali, if Eddie was 6'5 240+ and had the speed and reflexes he has now, he'd have a much better chance of winning unfortunately, we live in an era of HW boxing where sheer size makes all the difference
Not so................Julius Long would have dominated during the early days of boxing until about the 50s due to his solid jab and immense size combined with his intimidating appearance. But today, he's a journeymen who takes a punch, drops and collects his check. :-( Vitali can be outworked and outboxed. Can Chambers do it....well, I don't think he can, but he;s got a helluva lot better chin than Adamek so he's got a much better shot at pulling some rds during their fight, if they should fight.