Do you support the idea of the unbeatable h2h fighters?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Big Ukrainian, Jul 31, 2018.


  1. Big Ukrainian

    Big Ukrainian Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,647
    9,467
    Jan 10, 2007
    I don't support it at all. Even if we take fighters only at their peak.

    I believe that if we match, say, top-20 HWs of all time against each other at their peak, the best of the best, no one would have less than 3 losses.

    There are few reasons for that

    1) Styles. If we take Ali who is considered by many as the best h2h HW of all time, he had his stylistic nightmare Ken Norton which he couldn't beat convincingly at least once in 3 fights. Every fighter has wrong styles to deal with.

    2) Neither fighter in history isn't 'head and shoulders' above all the others. Every fighter has his flaws which would definitely be exposed if he's matched against the best in history, even if he's one of them.

    3) Fighters DO make mistakes even at their peak. Even the best fighter at his peak can make wrong decisions in the fight, or just get careless, and pay for it.

    Therefore I have no doubts that any given ATG fighter would've had his fair share of losses if he was matched in the line against the best in history, no matter how 'peak', how strong, how talented he is.
     
    Jel, BCS8, BitPlayerVesti and 5 others like this.
  2. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,737
    29,086
    Jun 2, 2006
    Nobody is unbeatable.
     
  3. BitPlayerVesti

    BitPlayerVesti Boxing Drunkie Full Member

    8,584
    11,099
    Oct 28, 2017
    I don't buy it either, all the greats had poor performances, and lesser fighters can overperform, especially if they have a gameplan that can work to their opponents weaknesses.
     
    mrkoolkevin and Big Ukrainian like this.
  4. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,354
    Jun 29, 2007
    Not really, but I do think its possible for a great fighter to win 60 or more fights in a row, or defend his belt 20 times or more. In the end father time is undefeated.
     
  5. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,398
    21,835
    Sep 15, 2009
    Nobody is unbeatable.

    I believe in one off fantasy fights you can favour one many over any other, but in this instance you have to consider synergy.

    I favour Jones Jr over every LHW who came before and after but I wouldn't favour him to emerge from a gauntlet of greats unbeaten.
     
  6. The Professor

    The Professor Socialist Ring Leader Staff Member

    26,069
    18,514
    Sep 29, 2008
    Not at all. If this were true, upsets would never happen.
     
  7. AlFrancis

    AlFrancis Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,812
    843
    Jul 25, 2008
    I agree
     
    Big Ukrainian likes this.
  8. Combatesdeboxeo_

    Combatesdeboxeo_ Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    2,991
    1,140
    Nov 19, 2016
    Lol sonny liston is the h2h superman but curiously he never showed it in the real world. Pathetic
     
    red cobra likes this.
  9. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,578
    Jan 30, 2014
    The problem is that some fans seem to view these guys as super heroes instead of as athletes competing in a high-risk sport against other top athletes, subject to injuries and ailments, distractions, bad reffing and judging, and, especially, plain bad luck, etc.
     
    Last edited: Jul 31, 2018
  10. Man_Machine

    Man_Machine Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,689
    9,876
    Jun 9, 2010
    In debate on speculative H2H scenarios, we reason for the likelihood of the outcome, applied under optimum conditions and to what are sometimes very fine lines.

    However, in practice, a 19-fight series against competitors, who are hard to separate in terms of their respective abilities, is almost certainly going to lead to mixed results. This too is speculation, of course, and follows the same type of reasoning of likelihood.
     
    Jel and mrkoolkevin like this.
  11. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,582
    27,243
    Feb 15, 2006
    No.

    If you give me your top 20 heavyweights of all time, then your number 20 would probably have a chance against your number 1, unless your number 1 had a big stylistic advantage (say it was Joe Louis vs Floyd Patterson).
     
  12. thesnowman22

    thesnowman22 Member Full Member

    432
    69
    Dec 29, 2013
    When we discuss "who would win", we are really discussing who wins the majority of the time. So even if you "win" the h2h match up, it really just means youd win >50%.

    "Noone could beat Tyson in his prime" for example.
    Well of course someone COULD. But who would beat him more than 50%? Everyone CAN be beat.
     
  13. Combatesdeboxeo_

    Combatesdeboxeo_ Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    2,991
    1,140
    Nov 19, 2016
    Lol foreman,holyfield,Ali,Lewis ?
     
  14. OvidsExile

    OvidsExile At a minimum, a huckleberry over your persimmon. Full Member

    35,237
    38,004
    Aug 28, 2012
    Everyone is beatable.
     
  15. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,592
    46,220
    Feb 11, 2005