Do you think a title belt should be at stake for the PAC-Cotto fight?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by buxzer, Jul 26, 2009.


  1. ceebz

    ceebz Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,462
    0
    Dec 8, 2008
    All parties involved in a title fight have to pay sanctioning fees. In the case with the WBO, they charge 3% of the purse or the fee cap of 150k. In the case of this fight, both Cotto and Pac would each have to pay a $150k sanctioning fee to the WBO, and the promotional company, (Top Rank) also has to pay $40k.
     
  2. PATSYS

    PATSYS Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,481
    18
    Aug 12, 2004
    Yes knowledgeable fight fans who were there when it happened will judge it like that. BUt the generations ahead will probably e swayed by the titles. I mean how many times did we hear DLH and SRL's credentials being the only so and so fighters to ever win so and so titles in so and so divisions although we all know DLH's title at 160 and SRL's title at 175 are hardly credible.
     
  3. Thinman

    Thinman Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,474
    3
    Aug 12, 2005
    Interesting reading. Again, I am not an expert on this but I think that the WBO is going beyond (abusing) its power..... why am I saying this???? because Cotto and Pac can fight a 10 round fight without the title on the line like any other 10 round fight.

    If Pac isn't Cotto's mando, then Cotto doesn't even has to fight him in the first place. In other words, if at the end of the day for whatever reason the fight doesn't happpen then the WBO can't say nothing.
     
  4. Thinman

    Thinman Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,474
    3
    Aug 12, 2005
    What I was trying to say is that probably Cotto has no problems in putting his title on the line, but he is not willing to pay his share of the sanctioning fees....

    Probably he left that up to Arum to decide, in other words if TOP Rank wants a title on the line, then TOP Rank should pay for Cotto's portion of the sanctioning fees. Could be that Cotto told that to Arum....

    Maybe Arum went back to Pac's lawyers and said that the title could be on the line but they (Pac) would have to pay Cotto's sanctioning fees... and probably they didn't accept that proposal from Arum, then the title wouldn't be on the line.

    At the end of the day might be that the problem and the solution to that problem is $$$$$$$$$$$
     
  5. Joser

    Joser Active Member Full Member

    746
    0
    Jun 20, 2009
    Titles don't mean **** anyway and to pay $400,000 for it? I say **** it.
     
  6. buxzer

    buxzer Eastern Champ Full Member

    6,107
    0
    Oct 4, 2008

    Thanks for clarifying this...:good

    What is $150k from $4.6M ? Just peanuts... Oppps that's more than 3%... WBO should lower that sanctioning fee further to something like $50k...
    .
     
  7. Knives7

    Knives7 Boxing Addict banned

    7,196
    2
    Jan 24, 2009
    Hmmmm the WBO should be on the line, I mean Pacquiao has no belt to offer but a win against Pacquiao is big. It will boost Cotto's P4P ranking by alot. number 3 probably
     
  8. cuchulain

    cuchulain Loyal Member Full Member

    38,686
    13,498
    Jan 6, 2007
    Fight should be at 147 or 140.

    A belt should then be on the line.
     
  9. YOUNG*LORD

    YOUNG*LORD Carlosv1968 is your daddy Full Member

    2,298
    0
    Jul 19, 2004
    for the belt to be up for grabs the fight should be held at 147...not 145..if pac wins is he going to force all his opponents to fight him at 145?....if he wants the WW belt then he should fight at the minimum weight required...not a catch weight.
     
  10. renyo

    renyo Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,417
    333
    Jul 21, 2007
    I'm stuck on this because i feel Cotto for saying no because they are not at the leisure of the full 147lb limit. But catch weight fights have usually been fought with titles on the line. And it will definitely be great for Pac to be the first man to ever be a 7 weight champ.
     
  11. DLSC

    DLSC Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,243
    0
    Jun 20, 2009
    If it's a title fight, I'll say, good. If it's a non title fight, I'm not going to loose sleep over it. All i want is to see the fight.
     
  12. kirk

    kirk l l l Staff Member

    71,785
    29,559
    Jul 26, 2004
    Im not quite sure the fuss over this....

    When you have two fighters like Pac and Cotto fighting eachother, who really gives a **** if a trinket is on the line or not? to everyone whining that pac wont be winning a belt should he win.... it doesnt matter, cottos scalp is worth more then the trinket hed get anyways. Cotto is NOT the champ at 147, Mosley is.... so the belt cotto holds means NOTHING.... now if it was mosley, then i could understand the complaining.

    but even then.... the true champion are made in the ring, not who wears what trinket.

    and if pac DOES beat cotto..... he still beat cotto! lol... him gaining or not gaining a belt does nothing to lessen or enhance his victory. It is what it is.....
     
  13. Dynasty091

    Dynasty091 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,633
    0
    Jul 2, 2008
    Co-sign.
     
  14. buxzer

    buxzer Eastern Champ Full Member

    6,107
    0
    Oct 4, 2008

    We're already guaranteed to see the fight, it's already a given...

    The question now is, what's the difference watching a title fight as against a non-title fight? ;)

    To casual fans/viewers, it might make a difference... They're excited to watch a "title fight" between Pacquiao and Cotto... ha ha :lol:
     
  15. DLSC

    DLSC Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,243
    0
    Jun 20, 2009
    I think the names of these two fighters and what they can do inside the ring is enough to get your casual viewer excited about the match. I have a lot of friends who rarely watches a boxing match that tuned in to watch the Pac/ODLH bout. They were eager and excited to watch the fight knowing that no titles were involved.

    The casual viewer will only watch fights that has big names on them, regardless if it's a title or non title bout. Only my opinion though.