Do You Think Charley Burley Could Have Taken Joe Louis The Distance?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by McGrain, Jun 22, 2007.


  1. MURK20

    MURK20 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,519
    1,344
    Sep 26, 2008
    I think Burley was evasive enough to escape real punishment for Louis. Burley was extremely cerebral in the ring. Extremely.
     
  2. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,727
    29,077
    Jun 2, 2006
    I don't see it.
     
  3. Legend X

    Legend X Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    6,315
    664
    Mar 18, 2005
    A prime Joe Louis ?
    No fuggin' way.
     
  4. the cobra

    the cobra Awesomeizationism! Full Member

    12,028
    106
    Jun 30, 2008
    If he'd fight purely to survive, sure. He's not lasting if he actually wanted to try and win it.
     
  5. burt bienstock

    burt bienstock Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,285
    400
    Jan 22, 2010
    The only TRUE heavyweight Charley Burley fought was a journeyman JD Turner in 1942. Ezzard Charles, Archie Moore and Lloyd Marshall were Light Heavies when Burley fought them...Charley Burley , great as he was, would have been cannon fodder for the prime Joe Louis...The only MW that would have a possible shot at a prime Joe Louis was Harry Greb because of his
    tremendous set of wheels...Like timing a fly in mid-air...
     
  6. Duodenum

    Duodenum Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,604
    290
    Apr 18, 2007
    When I look at the right hand to the body Joe made Schmeling scream out with, I just don't see Charley surviving too many of those. Burley utilized a similar stance to Max, but didn't have the same size or power. His highest competitive weight was 166. In his rubber match with Zivic, Fritzie was described as the harder puncher. Charles decked him in their first bout, and nearly knocked him out.

    The way Louis put shots together, it would be difficult for the relatively stationary 5'9" Burley to last.
     
  7. dpw417

    dpw417 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,461
    348
    Jul 13, 2007
    Logic says most of the post is pinpoint accurate...cept for the 'relatively stationary' part...Burley in the one film is economical with movement...but looks to be a ring genius in his judgement of distance. He had alot of upper body movement...and moved his feet when he needed to. Hence the term relatively stationary I suppose...Personally I think Burley would get his wins in a series against the other two notable Pittsburghers Greb and Conn. Those two are all timers...Burley is too.
     
  8. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,560
    46,152
    Feb 11, 2005
    Burley absolutely wins. Weight divisions are a tool of oppression by the Man.
     
  9. burt bienstock

    burt bienstock Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,285
    400
    Jan 22, 2010
    S, I love subtle humor, but are you serious ?
     
  10. Surf-Bat

    Surf-Bat Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,736
    97
    Jul 20, 2010
    No, but he could have made him look pretty inept for a few rounds. Maybe even sting him once or twice. I see Louis taking him out somewhere between rounds 7 and 10.
     
  11. TBooze

    TBooze Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,495
    2,150
    Oct 22, 2006
    I also suspect Joe and Jackie would have enough respect to carry Charley the distance, if need be.
     
  12. ironchamp

    ironchamp Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,365
    1,033
    Sep 5, 2004
    My thoughts exactly.
     
  13. Bummy Davis

    Bummy Davis Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,667
    2,153
    Aug 26, 2004
  14. thistle1

    thistle1 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,915
    151
    Jul 30, 2006
  15. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    269
    Jul 22, 2004
    I don't think so, just too small, but with his defence and ability to spoil, you never know