Do you think Diego won, or kampmann?

Discussion in 'MMA Forum' started by caleb_forrest_g, Mar 4, 2011.


  1. caleb_forrest_g

    caleb_forrest_g Active Member Full Member

    1,352
    0
    Apr 24, 2010
    i thoughts kampmann had a split decision, very close fight,
    never saw so many cuts, or bolld great fight though
     
  2. BewareofDawg

    BewareofDawg P4P Champ Full Member

    27,677
    184
    Apr 8, 2006
    How can you, 1 person, score a fight a split decision? :huh
     
  3. DeadlyOverhand

    DeadlyOverhand Active Member Full Member

    828
    0
    Dec 14, 2010
    Fixed.:good
     
  4. DeadlyOverhand

    DeadlyOverhand Active Member Full Member

    828
    0
    Dec 14, 2010
    Split Decison means when two out of the three judges score the guy a winner and the thrid judge scored the other guy the loser
    30-27
    30-27
    27-30

    But I had Sanchez winning by one point. Indeed a very close fight.
     
  5. Stoo

    Stoo Obsessed with Boxing banned

    25,846
    1
    Apr 4, 2008
    Very good point
     
  6. WATERBOY

    WATERBOY I Worship Steven Tucker Full Member

    1,598
    0
    Sep 2, 2009
    I always find it strange when people say that! They just can't know what a SD means!
     
  7. Stoo

    Stoo Obsessed with Boxing banned

    25,846
    1
    Apr 4, 2008
    I think he may have meant they split the rounds ie Sanchez won 2 Martin won 1
     
  8. Boinko

    Boinko Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,165
    0
    Oct 2, 2004
    I'm guessing that what you mean is you personally scored the fight for Kampmann, but would have liked to have seen the judges score the fight a split decision for him.
    That way, he would have got the victory, but the split decision would have reflected the fact that the fight was very close, and Sanchez could just as easily have been the victor.
    Correct?
     
  9. BewareofDawg

    BewareofDawg P4P Champ Full Member

    27,677
    184
    Apr 8, 2006
  10. achillesthegreat

    achillesthegreat FORTUNE FAVOURS THE BRAVE Full Member

    37,070
    29
    Jul 21, 2004
    kampmann won that fight. a MMA judge should know what he is seeing. a mainstream fan will think aggression and blood and guts win the fight but not knowledgable people.

    kampmann was the far more technical fighter. his boxing was much better and he busted him up. those wild attacks didn't land. kampmann was far more surgical in his striking. kamps also stuffed every takedown bar one where he got up very quickly. all the other take downs were stuffed and punished with knees.

    poor judging where a few entertaining moments does not win a fight.
     
  11. saul_ir34

    saul_ir34 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,549
    0
    May 6, 2007
    Do you have multiple personalities???
     
  12. chimba

    chimba Off the Somali Coast Full Member

    20,005
    7
    Mar 8, 2007
    If youre a sophisticated judge, then its Kampmann, close but clear.

    If you're an MMA judge, whoever moved/punched/grunted more which was Diego.
     
  13. rekcutnevets

    rekcutnevets Black Sash Full Member

    13,685
    344
    May 25, 2007
    If you judge for the rounds based on which fighter did more damage, and was closest to finishing his opponent; then Diaz was the clear winner.

    If you judge the fight for the fighter that marked his opponent's face up in the 1st round, and preceded to lose the next 2 rounds, then Kampmann is your guy.
     
  14. achillesthegreat

    achillesthegreat FORTUNE FAVOURS THE BRAVE Full Member

    37,070
    29
    Jul 21, 2004
    lets go with the judge who got the names right :)
     
  15. leejunfan777

    leejunfan777 Guest

    when diego scored the takedown i knew he won
    but i personnaly think kampman deserves the win big time