1) Beating Cotto into submission 2) Two devastating KO's of Cintron 3) Lujans ear looking like Tyson took a bite 4) Clottey arm injury Do you think Margarito cheated in his past fights? When? Its all speculation but share your opinion.
Why wouldn'nt he have? He wanted too in a fight he was a favorite. The Cotto fight was the BIGGEST fight of his mexican life and Cotto was undefeated, the fav and a known hard hitter.. it was Also Marg's last fight so less chance that much changed corner wise..
ESB has the highest rate of genius's on the www.This individual can even make a poll based on inuendo and nothing more.Fail.
Yes! It's very unusual people get caught the first time doing something wrong/illegal.. But I guess we'll never find out
I consider the Executive Director, Dean Lohis, of the California State athletic commission stating that a "foreign substance was found" more then innuendo, in fact it is damning no matter how you look at it.
What does this have to do with "past fights",is the question.Nothing is the correct answer.You are attempting to link one plus one but it equals 3.It is all based on suggestion and nothing more.
Yes the guy knew he limited and going no where so he sought to load his gloves to give him the extra edge he needed.
IIii am not attempting to do anything of the kind my dear sir. I simply asked others for THIER opinions. Common sense and deductive reasoning are admissible in this courtroom. Now let me ask you this and don't pull any lawyer tricks and avoid the question. IF you were a part of someones camp training a boxer, or even if you were the boxer himself knowingly cheating in boxing fights, would you start to do so AFTER you won the title against a perceived veteran that is "shop-worn"? (it doesn't matter if the boxer himself knew or if it was just people in the camp, the question is legitmate either way).
There isn't a SHRED of evidence that he did, none. It hasn't even been PROVEN that he did it the Mosley fight - but even if it is, it does not PROVE he did it in others. People will continue to speculate, and that is truly a shame, because there is no EVIDENCE to support it.
Most likely there will never be proof that he did in others.. what do you want a time machine? All we can do is work with what we have.. if the commission confirms what it already has stated about the foreign substance then speculation is not only acceptable but necessary.
This is where you and I disagree. In the absence of ANY evidence, such wild speculation is wrong and irresponsible - and utterly without merit.