Do you think match fixing is very common after watching GGG vs Alvarez 2?

Including myself, majority of boxing fans and authorities concluded that GGG was the winner in GGG vs Alvarez 2 match.

GGG is 36 and Kazakh, from Central Asia.
Canelo is 28 and Mexican, from Americas.

Which one has a longer future ahead of himself and who would bring more $$$?

They made Canelo a legend by not letting him lose in the 1st match and making him beat the undefeated GGG in the 2nd match. Now Alvarez is very popular. He'll generate a lot of $$$ for everybody. They needed a new Mayweather/Pacquaio. They chose Canelo.

Now, why would I watch boxing again? It is not a competitive sport anymore. I'd rather watch WWE, it is more entertaining.

 

"Do you think [blank] is common after [insert one single instance of blank]?"

Great way to kick off a discourse, BRUH!

 

Well said man
And it’s so obvious to everyone what’s going on
Watch the next fix take place: Jacobs vs Derevyenchenko
If the fight is close watch Jacobs bag all the points, the swing points that is

 

Dave Moretti is such a lazy, flip-flopping little whoore First he gets paid off by DLH to score the first fight for
GGG and then gets paid to do the same for Canelo but brings the original scorecards into the rematch. SMH

 

He may be foreign.

 

The judges know who butters their bread

 

Foreigners can't use logic? (as this really doesn't seem to be a linguistic foible)

THAT'S MAD RACIST & XENOPHOBIC YO

 

Haha

Must not have been watching very long...

 

If my dear old mother can see it and she hates boxing then it must be so obvious.
I hate the uncertainty of not knowing what to believe anymore,case in point I was so surprised when Wilder v Ortiz went down normally.
This is a worldwide problem as well......Australia and the U.K. are pretty bad

 

Lets just put it like this. If people think that there is something shady going on with the judges every time Canelo fights ill present some simple evidence. Canelo was absolutely and clearly dominated by FlIVd in their fight. It couldnt have been a more clear win yet CJ Ross had it a draw. And in the first fight we all saw what Adalaide Birdbrain did.

 

It's business with many hands in the cookie jar so the guy who fills the jar with most cookies will always have the deck stacked in his favour you'd have to be insane to think people will pass up on hundreds of millions cause of honor and doing the right thing lol.

 

I don't understand what you mean?

 

It means how can you point to just one robbery and say that robberies are widespread based on that?

If you want to say a thing is common you need to point out many instances of it being pervasive, no? More than one anyway?

 

I've been saying this exact statement for 8 years on this forum now...

"East Side Boxing: where 115-113 [obviously razor close and debatable] fights are 'robberies.'"