yeah like 3 times and they all came back positive. his last 1 was negative. so 3 positives r better than 1 negative? nicca please morales is a drug cheat how many times i got to tell ya u only test twice not 300 zillion times until u turn up negative. fuggin moron LOL
NYSAC was not even informed that there were irregularities in morales' results. they just got hold of the situation not until 2 days before the fight and after the thursday conference. you are talking out of your ass, as per usual, here.
The only credible source that I saw reporting on this said that his "A" and "B" samples from one day came back dirty and his "A" sample from the next time they collected (like two days later) came back clean. Again I ask, WTF else do you think USADA should have done? Refuse to test the remainder of his samples? They don't have any authority over the fighters, the promoters, the WBC or the NYSAC who all decided that the fight should go on as planned, so what else could they have done?
and peterson, berto and other PED users could test negative if you test them again and again and again. USADA truly is the GOLDen boy STANDARD.
Which one is it, dip****? Were they informed before the fight or were they not? :think We know the WBC was because they released a statement well before the fight explaining why they weren't going to do anything about the failed test(s). Go ahead and duck the question, piggy. We all know that's your go-to move. :yep
u cant be tested more than twice for the upth time. LOL usada violated wada principles of being tested more than 2 times. once 2 positives there is no more testing. u r a cheat. if he came back positive 1st and then negative, then hes clear. u delusional fug
morales' A and B samples both tested positive in samples collected 17 days and 10 days before the fight. that's a total of 4 postives. they could have at least told NYSAC about it or if they reaaly claim to be an advocate of clean athletes, they could have released it to media knowing they have no authority in pro boxing. but of course they would not do that because getting more GBP money is their first priority than having clean athletes right?
He was tested more than twice, so yes, you can be tested more than twice, dip****. :deal Again, WADA principles have nothing to do with a private contract between USADA and the fighters/promoters. USADA wasn't working in any official capacity in this case. They were hired to test and report their findings to the parties involved, and that's exactly what they did.
read the article dumb****! NYSAC was not even informed by USADA. they got hold of the information 2 days before the fight through other parties. all the while, schaefer knows about it.
no u cant u dumb shite. its in the rules. u r talking about shite u have no idea as usual. its like u make up shite as u go along LOL u have been owned and pawned as a dumb arse fa--ot troll:deal
Morales'* (you forgot to capitalize) That's* (you forgot to capitalize again) They* (capitalize) really* But* (capitalize)
Legit source? They're legally bound by whatever contract they had with the fighters/promoters who hired them and not obligated to report anything to anybody who they haven't agreed to report to. The fact remains it was reported, and everyone involved was made well aware of the situation before the fight. The NYSAC, the WBC, the promoters and Danny Garcia all chose to go on with the fight as scheduled, and you can blame them for that because USADA wasn't given the authority to make that decision.
The NYSAC was informed before the fight. Case closed. :deal at this pathetic, broke ass piece of **** trying to call me dumb.
Look at these guys defending the indefensible, but they won't hesitate to perpetuate accusations born from no proof whatsoever. Selective morality.