Yeah, if we assume he was at 3 before. Even in being damn near shut out, he lost to the best fighter on the planet who should be ranked no lower than 1b p4p. I'm of the opinion that he didn't look good because Floyd made him look bad, not because he's shot.
*****s will vote yes to make the victory seem bigger than it is, a boxing clinic on a near 40 year old opponent.
I am frankly amazed that despite Margarito being busted right before the fight with loaded hand wraps that they made such a big deal out of Mosley winning. I was under no impression he had a chance at beating Floyd. Not last year and not this year.
Had he made it a great fight even in defeat yea he would be. But the performance was so appalling that he fell off the charts in 36 mins.
Probably, lower end. Marquez looked terrible against Mayweather also, but I didn't rip him from the list.
What McGrain said, although I'd mention the Ring had him at number 3 before the Mayweather fight, and I thought that was just grotesquely self serving horse ****.
They don't need to vote yes for that reason as when Mayweather beat him he was ranked P4P#3. It's hard to say where Shane is at the moment and I don't think it's fair to write someone off on the back of one bad performance, it's not as if there are people proving themselves worthy of taking his place just yet in the top 10.
I will have to see him fight again to gauge where he should be. Just because you lose a lopsided decision to Mayweather doesn't mean you arent a pound for pounder.