Do you think PAC was schooled by Marquez?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Stinky gloves, Aug 1, 2007.


  1. mad_takamura

    mad_takamura It's getting hot in here! Full Member

    2,408
    0
    Jul 16, 2007
    ok stick to the topic people: I NEED TO RETALIATE COZ I CRIED LIKE A BABY AFTER THEY HIT GOLOTA ON THE GOLOTA EXPRESS:hey :hey :hey
     
  2. H .

    H . Boxing Junkie banned

    12,826
    3
    Jan 20, 2007
    I didn't slip, I simply acknowledged his comment. fool
     
  3. Stinky gloves

    Stinky gloves Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,255
    14
    May 31, 2007
    MAN, you so blind nuthugger. PAC is #1 or #2 fighter in the world, he is at his peak.
    Now you comparing 40y old Golota who lost all he could to PAC and you saying he is pathetic ... you Einstein :yikes
    Maybe you going to set thread like that with poll:

    "Hi, I'm PAC nuthugger I think Golota is pathetic comparing PAC who is better fighter overall ... "

    - Do you really think I'm right?
    - Maybe there is slight possibility 40y old Golota is somehow better?
    - Do you think PAC nuthuggers like me are obsessive morons and imbecyles?

    Geez stick to the ****ing topic :deal
     
  4. mad_takamura

    mad_takamura It's getting hot in here! Full Member

    2,408
    0
    Jul 16, 2007
    this thread sucks... this topic was already debated WAYBACK before and now he's only bringing it back because of his tears for golota tsktsk..that's why i feel sorry for this guy:verysad
     
  5. boxbox

    boxbox Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,220
    0
    Feb 4, 2006
    enough of this..has been debated too many times with the same outcome.

    The REMATCH is in the making, so until then..enjoy other fights! 2007 is a great boxing year!
     
  6. mad_takamura

    mad_takamura It's getting hot in here! Full Member

    2,408
    0
    Jul 16, 2007
    it's pretty obvious what your real intentions are! this **** is already debated before why go back at it again!!?!?:patsch :patsch

    "Geez stick to the ****ing topic " so what? so you can hit at the ones who had a view that marquez didn't school pac? man i can understand your gay feelings for golota but don't pretend sheesh!!:-(
     
  7. Stinky gloves

    Stinky gloves Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,255
    14
    May 31, 2007
    You are relly pathetic, you so obsessed with Golota I fell sorry for you!
    Don't like topic of this thread then post somewhere else!
     
  8. theunderdog

    theunderdog Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,814
    1
    Jul 4, 2006
    obessed with golota and you pity him? you should be buddies, you're both obsessed with the dude
     
  9. Stinky gloves

    Stinky gloves Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,255
    14
    May 31, 2007
    That is my intention to see what was his total performance in that fight. :think

    He off course flored Marquez 3 times in the first round which shows exceptional performance over there.
    However if you see this differently Marquez show exceptional determination and pretty solid chin. So 10-7 would be all right.

    But to ansfer what was PAC total perfromance you must count the other 11 rounds
    and MOST people see that these rounds were not even close.
    I'm not hating on PAC, I just want to know how is that poor performance fitting the #2 pond-4-pound fighter?
    I like PAC and want to see him to be the true #1 pvp but some exceptions do not allow me to be his nuthugger like you guys.

    So if you are not PAC nuthugger or if you are but you are not complete imbecyle then tell me the truth, don't be shy.

    And to be clear in one aspect:
    YES Golota would kill PAC in the ring with both broken hands and legs.
    YES again, PAC is better fighter than Golota would ever immagine to be, so stop this nonsense.
     
  10. theunderdog

    theunderdog Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,814
    1
    Jul 4, 2006
    but the judge himself said that if he knew 10-6 was a possible score, then he would have made it scored it that way
     
  11. Stinky gloves

    Stinky gloves Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,255
    14
    May 31, 2007
    I don't have problem with the first round, whathever it was 10-6 or 10-7 :conf
    it doesn't change the fact that PAC performance in the next 11 rounds was not so briliant. :deal
    So make me his nuthugger, tell me something I should know to belive he was really better than Marquez :hand
     
  12. mad_takamura

    mad_takamura It's getting hot in here! Full Member

    2,408
    0
    Jul 16, 2007
    know what stinky? this would go on again and again in a stupid cycle:huh even if the facts would be laid in front of you , you would not accept it why don't you go and dig the old threads and learn from your own ignorance eh?:huh
     
  13. Stinky gloves

    Stinky gloves Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,255
    14
    May 31, 2007
    Why you don't light me up and put these facts in the next post se we can see if I can accept them or not?
    The only I need is just a little logic so I can believe in your story. So what your word?

    Btw. You know the ESB just crashed a few weeks ago and old threads doesn't exist, do you?
     
  14. Morrissey

    Morrissey Underrated Full Member

    6,322
    3
    Jun 24, 2006
    What was your scorecard for that fight? Round by Round?
     
  15. Stinky gloves

    Stinky gloves Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,255
    14
    May 31, 2007
    A draw is fair, it means Marquez won 7-4 the latest rounds.